The Impact of AI Assistance on the Academic Writing Self-Efficacy of Undergraduates with Different Writing Abilities

Against digital education background, generative AI has become common writing assistance for undergraduates. Existing studies mainly focus on second-language writing and ignore stratified comparisons across learners, while the dual effects of AI on academic writing self-efficacy remain understudied. Based on self-efficacy theory, this paper distributes questionnaires and divides respondents into three proficiency groups by CET-4 scores. Descriptive statistics, group difference tests and correlation analysis are adopted for empirical analysis. The results reveal prevalent AI over-dependence despite its polishing functions. Participants’ writing self-efficacy stays at medium-upper level yet hampered by writing anxiety. AI delivers short-term confidence promotion but impairs independent writing competence in the long run, with stronger influences on low-proficiency students. This stratified dual-path framework offers empirical references for standardized AI application in university writing teaching.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education and Educational Research
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/g0jpqq78
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of AI Assistance on the Academic Writing Self-Efficacy of Undergraduates with Different Writing Abilities

Minming Gong
3 links
Journal of Education and Educational Research
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

The Impact of AI Assistance on the Academic Writing Self-Efficacy of Undergraduates with Different Writing Abilities

Minming Gong
article en

Abstract

Against digital education background, generative AI has become common writing assistance for undergraduates. Existing studies mainly focus on second-language writing and ignore stratified comparisons across learners, while the dual effects of AI on academic writing self-efficacy remain understudied. Based on self-efficacy theory, this paper distributes questionnaires and divides respondents into three proficiency groups by CET-4 scores. Descriptive statistics, group difference tests and correlation analysis are adopted for empirical analysis. The results reveal prevalent AI over-dependence despite its polishing functions. Participants’ writing self-efficacy stays at medium-upper level yet hampered by writing anxiety. AI delivers short-term confidence promotion but impairs independent writing competence in the long run, with stronger influences on low-proficiency students. This stratified dual-path framework offers empirical references for standardized AI application in university writing teaching.

Journal of Education and Educational ResearchVol. 21(2)
Shanghai Normal University (CN)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon