Sustainable Development and Socioeconomic Disparities: A Quantitative Analysis of Brazilian Regions Based on the SDGs

ABSTRACT This study examines patterns of socioeconomic inequality among Brazil's 26 state capitals and the Federal District, totaling 27 capitals, and assesses the discriminatory capacity of SDG‐related indicators within the country's five major regions. The analysis uses data from the 2024 Map of Inequality among State Capitals, developed by the Sustainable Cities Institute and the Sustainable Cities Program. The Entropy Method was applied separately to each regional and dimensional subset to estimate the relative variability and discriminatory capacity of SDG‐related indicators across environmental, social, and economic dimensions. The resulting weights are interpreted as measures of variability within each subset, rather than as evidence of substantive importance, severity, or causal influence. Within each regional and dimensional subset, indicators with higher entropy weights showed greater variability and discriminatory capacity among the capitals analyzed. In the environmental dimension, these indicators included solid waste management, sanitation‐related diseases, vegetation cover, CO 2 emissions, and wastewater treatment. In the social dimension, sports infrastructure, violence against the LGBTQI+ population, and the Black/non‐Black infant mortality ratio were among the indicators with greater discriminatory capacity. Public investment in infrastructure received high weights across the five regional analyses, reflecting its discriminatory capacity within the respective subsets without implying causal influence or direct comparability across regions and dimensions. This study contributes to the sustainable development literature by providing a replicable entropy‐based framework for examining territorially differentiated patterns in SDG‐related indicators. The approach can complement sustainability monitoring and support the identification of indicators requiring further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71813
Primary Topic
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable Development and Socioeconomic Disparities: A Quantitative Analysis of Brazilian Regions Based on the SDGs

Lucas Veiga Ávila, Diego Marques Cavalcante, Ana Paula Belizário, Nisrin Naiel Dib Khaled
Sustainable Development
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
article

Sustainable Development and Socioeconomic Disparities: A Quantitative Analysis of Brazilian Regions Based on the SDGs

Lucas Veiga Ávila, Diego Marques Cavalcante, Ana Paula Belizário, Nisrin Naiel Dib Khaled
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines patterns of socioeconomic inequality among Brazil's 26 state capitals and the Federal District, totaling 27 capitals, and assesses the discriminatory capacity of SDG‐related indicators within the country's five major regions. The analysis uses data from the 2024 Map of Inequality among State Capitals, developed by the Sustainable Cities Institute and the Sustainable Cities Program. The Entropy Method was applied separately to each regional and dimensional subset to estimate the relative variability and discriminatory capacity of SDG‐related indicators across environmental, social, and economic dimensions. The resulting weights are interpreted as measures of variability within each subset, rather than as evidence of substantive importance, severity, or causal influence. Within each regional and dimensional subset, indicators with higher entropy weights showed greater variability and discriminatory capacity among the capitals analyzed. In the environmental dimension, these indicators included solid waste management, sanitation‐related diseases, vegetation cover, CO 2 emissions, and wastewater treatment. In the social dimension, sports infrastructure, violence against the LGBTQI+ population, and the Black/non‐Black infant mortality ratio were among the indicators with greater discriminatory capacity. Public investment in infrastructure received high weights across the five regional analyses, reflecting its discriminatory capacity within the respective subsets without implying causal influence or direct comparability across regions and dimensions. This study contributes to the sustainable development literature by providing a replicable entropy‐based framework for examining territorially differentiated patterns in SDG‐related indicators. The approach can complement sustainability monitoring and support the identification of indicators requiring further investigation.

Sustainable Development
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
Reduced inequalities, Sustainable cities and communities, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon