Australian Studies in China: Resilient, Relevant, but Not Assured

The strength of the Australian studies community in China has long been cited as a standout achievement of the field. Some recent scholarship is more critical, arguing, for example, that Australian studies in China has failed to appropriately diversify away from its origins in literature studies, which limits its engagement with contemporary Australia. To assess the current state of Australian studies in China, this article draws on a unique dataset assembled from seven editions of the International Conference of Australian Studies in China over the past decade. Apart from the pandemic period, participation has remained consistently high. Graduate students typically account for at least one-third of paper presentations. A convening role is also revealed with extensive involvement from institutions not hosting an Australian Studies Centre. Two-thirds of presentations were from disciplines other than literature studies, such as economics/business and international relations, and these closely tracked developments in the Australia–China bilateral relationship. Our findings point to a resilient community that retains relevance. However, its sustainability, both in terms of scale and character, is not assured. Limits on academic exchanges being driven by securitisation have the potential to be especially damaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Australian Studies
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2026.2746666
Primary Topic
Cultural Studies and Colonialism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Australian Studies in China: Resilient, Relevant, but Not Assured

James Stuart. Laurenceson, Xi Chen
Journal of Australian Studies
Cultural Studies and Colonialism
article

Australian Studies in China: Resilient, Relevant, but Not Assured

James Stuart. Laurenceson, Xi Chen
article en

Abstract

The strength of the Australian studies community in China has long been cited as a standout achievement of the field. Some recent scholarship is more critical, arguing, for example, that Australian studies in China has failed to appropriately diversify away from its origins in literature studies, which limits its engagement with contemporary Australia. To assess the current state of Australian studies in China, this article draws on a unique dataset assembled from seven editions of the International Conference of Australian Studies in China over the past decade. Apart from the pandemic period, participation has remained consistently high. Graduate students typically account for at least one-third of paper presentations. A convening role is also revealed with extensive involvement from institutions not hosting an Australian Studies Centre. Two-thirds of presentations were from disciplines other than literature studies, such as economics/business and international relations, and these closely tracked developments in the Australia–China bilateral relationship. Our findings point to a resilient community that retains relevance. However, its sustainability, both in terms of scale and character, is not assured. Limits on academic exchanges being driven by securitisation have the potential to be especially damaging.

Journal of Australian Studies
University of Technology Sydney (AU), East China Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cultural Studies and Colonialism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Australian Studies in China: Resilient, Relevant, but Not Assured — James Stuart. Laurenceson, Xi Chen · Journal of Australian Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS