PLA/PLC “Smart Patch” functionality assessment for fetal duraplasty in prenatal myelomeningocele repair using a fetoscopic surgical simulator

BACKGROUND: Fetoscopy has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open hysterotomy for prenatal repair of myelomeningocele (MMC), which often requires a dural substitute. Our team developed a novel PLA/PCL patch optimized for fetoscopic surgery. This study compared the performance of the PLA/PCL patch with a human umbilical cord (HUC) graft. METHODS: Twenty-seven medical professionals with varied experience performed four MMC repair tasks in a fetoscopic simulator: patch introduction, manipulation, placement, and suture. In a randomized crossover design, each participant performed the tasks twice, once with each graft. Task times were recorded. After each attempt, participants completed task-specific difficulty questionnaires and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); after both attempts, they completed a comparative questionnaire assessing overall preference and perceived performance. RESULTS: Participants included nine experts, nine intermediates, and nine novices. Introduction was significantly faster with PLA/PCL across all experience levels and overall (16 ± 7 s vs 35 ± 17 s, p < 0.001). Manipulation was also shorter with PLA/PCL (50 ± 29 s vs 69 ± 36 s, p = 0.05), whereas placement was longer (79 ± 71 s vs 43 ± 23 s, p = 0.017). Suturing time and total procedural time did not differ between grafts. NASA-TLX scores showed lower physical demand (p = 0.003) and effort (p = 0.018) with PLA/PCL. The pre-folded design was rated highly useful (mean=9.1/10), with minimal unfolding difficulty (mean = 2.1/10). Most participants found PLA/PCL easier for introduction (85%), manipulation (81%), placement (78%), and suturing (85%). CONCLUSION: The PLA/PCL patch is a promising dural substitute for prenatal MMC repair. Its shape-memory design enabled faster introduction and manipulation and reduced perceived workload compared with HUC, while maintaining comparable total procedural times. These findings support further preclinical evaluation of this novel graft.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13517-7
Primary Topic
Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PLA/PLC “Smart Patch” functionality assessment for fetal duraplasty in prenatal myelomeningocele repair using a fetoscopic surgical simulator

Soner Duru, Marcos Minamoto Miyabe, Nilhan Torlak, Jose Luis Peiro et al.
Surgical Endoscopy
Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
article

PLA/PLC “Smart Patch” functionality assessment for fetal duraplasty in prenatal myelomeningocele repair using a fetoscopic surgical simulator

Soner Duru, Marcos Minamoto Miyabe, Nilhan Torlak, Jose Luis Peiro, Marc Oria, Ned Hawes, María Florencia Varela, Chia-Ying Lin
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fetoscopy has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open hysterotomy for prenatal repair of myelomeningocele (MMC), which often requires a dural substitute. Our team developed a novel PLA/PCL patch optimized for fetoscopic surgery. This study compared the performance of the PLA/PCL patch with a human umbilical cord (HUC) graft. METHODS: Twenty-seven medical professionals with varied experience performed four MMC repair tasks in a fetoscopic simulator: patch introduction, manipulation, placement, and suture. In a randomized crossover design, each participant performed the tasks twice, once with each graft. Task times were recorded. After each attempt, participants completed task-specific difficulty questionnaires and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); after both attempts, they completed a comparative questionnaire assessing overall preference and perceived performance. RESULTS: Participants included nine experts, nine intermediates, and nine novices. Introduction was significantly faster with PLA/PCL across all experience levels and overall (16 ± 7 s vs 35 ± 17 s, p < 0.001). Manipulation was also shorter with PLA/PCL (50 ± 29 s vs 69 ± 36 s, p = 0.05), whereas placement was longer (79 ± 71 s vs 43 ± 23 s, p = 0.017). Suturing time and total procedural time did not differ between grafts. NASA-TLX scores showed lower physical demand (p = 0.003) and effort (p = 0.018) with PLA/PCL. The pre-folded design was rated highly useful (mean=9.1/10), with minimal unfolding difficulty (mean = 2.1/10). Most participants found PLA/PCL easier for introduction (85%), manipulation (81%), placement (78%), and suturing (85%). CONCLUSION: The PLA/PCL patch is a promising dural substitute for prenatal MMC repair. Its shape-memory design enabled faster introduction and manipulation and reduced perceived workload compared with HUC, while maintaining comparable total procedural times. These findings support further preclinical evaluation of this novel graft.

Surgical Endoscopy
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Convergent Science (United States) (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), New York University (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon