The Political Analysis of Selected EAC Member States’ Responses to COVID-19 and International Human Rights Standards: Learning from the Past

In the early 2020s, the world was grappling with the COVID-19 pandemic as one of the worst worldwide misfortunes of the 21st century. Governments around the world instituted a range of emergency rules in their territories in trying to contain the pandemic. In the East African Community (EAC), the pandemic was said to have accelerated the erosion of the democratic foundation on which protection of human rights eventually depends. The claim was that the pandemic had provided some EAC governments with an idyllic pretext to bring in disproportionate restraints on freedom of assembly, press freedom, and the capacity of human rights campaigners, opposition political parties, and civil society to operate. Stemming from desk research, this piece revisited relevant international treaties, institutional reports, speeches, media, and articles in connection with the various public health measures instituted by three selected EAC founding member states–Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda–to control the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to universally accepted standards of human rights. The analysis found incidents of using the pandemic as an excuse to inflict fears and crackdown on dissent, restrict people’s rights, and adopt emergency legislations which seemed to have long-lasting consequences beyond the health predicament in the selected states. The paradoxes in countering COVID-19 in these states revealed the difficulty in balancing health standards, legal requirements, and political interests in emerging democracies. As long as states can hardly be fair judges of their own deeds, the paper recommends investigation and prosecution by international legal institutions of those who violated basic human rights in the name of controlling the pandemic. Moreover, the paper reminds governments not to politicise future pandemics, which may inflict further pain on their citizens and violate their basic political rights standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
East African Journal of Arts and Social Sciences
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37284/eajass.9.4.6168
Primary Topic
Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Political Analysis of Selected EAC Member States’ Responses to COVID-19 and International Human Rights Standards: Learning from the Past

Miraji Masudi Kitigwa
East African Journal of Arts and Social Sciences
Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
article

The Political Analysis of Selected EAC Member States’ Responses to COVID-19 and International Human Rights Standards: Learning from the Past

Miraji Masudi Kitigwa
article en

Abstract

In the early 2020s, the world was grappling with the COVID-19 pandemic as one of the worst worldwide misfortunes of the 21st century. Governments around the world instituted a range of emergency rules in their territories in trying to contain the pandemic. In the East African Community (EAC), the pandemic was said to have accelerated the erosion of the democratic foundation on which protection of human rights eventually depends. The claim was that the pandemic had provided some EAC governments with an idyllic pretext to bring in disproportionate restraints on freedom of assembly, press freedom, and the capacity of human rights campaigners, opposition political parties, and civil society to operate. Stemming from desk research, this piece revisited relevant international treaties, institutional reports, speeches, media, and articles in connection with the various public health measures instituted by three selected EAC founding member states–Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda–to control the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to universally accepted standards of human rights. The analysis found incidents of using the pandemic as an excuse to inflict fears and crackdown on dissent, restrict people’s rights, and adopt emergency legislations which seemed to have long-lasting consequences beyond the health predicament in the selected states. The paradoxes in countering COVID-19 in these states revealed the difficulty in balancing health standards, legal requirements, and political interests in emerging democracies. As long as states can hardly be fair judges of their own deeds, the paper recommends investigation and prosecution by international legal institutions of those who violated basic human rights in the name of controlling the pandemic. Moreover, the paper reminds governments not to politicise future pandemics, which may inflict further pain on their citizens and violate their basic political rights standards.

East African Journal of Arts and Social SciencesVol. 9(4)
Open University of Tanzania (TZ)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon