Democratic Backsliding and International Democracy Promotion in the Post-Liberal Era

This study analyzed how democratic backsliding promotes international democracy in the post-liberal era. Using a mixed-methods research design, the study quantitatively analyzed data provided by Freedom House, Varieties of Democracy, and Polity IV, and finally qualitatively analyzed data provided by international responses, multilateral democracy mechanisms, and aid conditionality policies. The study also analyzed international trends between 2000 and 2024. The findings of the study indicated that democratic decline has become widespread and subtle. It also characterized democratic decline with executive aggrandizement, manipulation of elections, weak judicial independence, restricted civil society, and media capture, as opposed to abrupt authoritarian takeovers. The study also found that democracy-promotion actors and activities face increasing constraints caused by sovereignty-based narratives, decreasing liberal international institutions, and geopolitical competition. Quantitative evidence illustrated a decrease in liberal democracy in multiple regions. Qualitative evidence showed uneven sanctions, election observation, regional governance frameworks, and aid conditionality across regions. The article concluded that democracy promotion is relevant, but the adoption of a post-liberal environment is required to address the issue of international organizations’ influence becoming more fragmented while domestic actors are becoming the main determinants of democratic trajectories. The article also concluded that stronger support for civil society, regional democracy-promotion initiatives, independent media, and local accountability institutions is regarded as being more sustainable as opposed to depending on external pressure only. The article also concluded that despite democratic backsliding showing a trend of decreasing, the effectiveness of democracy-promotion approaches, if properly applied, could strengthen democratic resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
London Journal of Research In Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34257/ljrhss268068uk
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democratic Backsliding and International Democracy Promotion in the Post-Liberal Era

Mary Kalu Johana
London Journal of Research In Humanities and Social Sciences
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Democratic Backsliding and International Democracy Promotion in the Post-Liberal Era

Mary Kalu Johana
article en

Abstract

This study analyzed how democratic backsliding promotes international democracy in the post-liberal era. Using a mixed-methods research design, the study quantitatively analyzed data provided by Freedom House, Varieties of Democracy, and Polity IV, and finally qualitatively analyzed data provided by international responses, multilateral democracy mechanisms, and aid conditionality policies. The study also analyzed international trends between 2000 and 2024. The findings of the study indicated that democratic decline has become widespread and subtle. It also characterized democratic decline with executive aggrandizement, manipulation of elections, weak judicial independence, restricted civil society, and media capture, as opposed to abrupt authoritarian takeovers. The study also found that democracy-promotion actors and activities face increasing constraints caused by sovereignty-based narratives, decreasing liberal international institutions, and geopolitical competition. Quantitative evidence illustrated a decrease in liberal democracy in multiple regions. Qualitative evidence showed uneven sanctions, election observation, regional governance frameworks, and aid conditionality across regions. The article concluded that democracy promotion is relevant, but the adoption of a post-liberal environment is required to address the issue of international organizations’ influence becoming more fragmented while domestic actors are becoming the main determinants of democratic trajectories. The article also concluded that stronger support for civil society, regional democracy-promotion initiatives, independent media, and local accountability institutions is regarded as being more sustainable as opposed to depending on external pressure only. The article also concluded that despite democratic backsliding showing a trend of decreasing, the effectiveness of democracy-promotion approaches, if properly applied, could strengthen democratic resilience.

London Journal of Research In Humanities and Social Sciences
University of Nairobi (KE)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Democratic Backsliding and International Democracy Promotion in the Post-Liberal Era — Mary Kalu Johana · London Journal of Research In Humanities and Social Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS