Decision-making and coordination in bio-CCUS value chains: Finnish companies, municipalities, and the role of national and EU-level policy

Biogenic carbon capture, utilization, and storage (bio-CCUS) is technically feasible and strategically important for climate policy, yet deployment remains largely pre-commercial. While individual bio-CCUS technologies are increasingly well understood, the actor-level dynamics and governance conditions determining value chain formation are less studied. We address that gap through semi-structured interviews with representatives of 13 companies across bio-CCUS value chains and four forerunner municipalities in Finland, characterizing the decision-making environment facing both groups, complemented by an analysis of EU-level and national regulation. The findings reveal that investment in bio-CCUS is primarily constrained by system-level coordination failures: a chicken-and-egg dynamic persists between CO₂ producers waiting for stable demand and users waiting for reliable supply, while missing logistics infrastructure, spatial dependencies, and regulatory fragmentation across legal domains compound the challenge. Biogenic CO₂ is currently largely excluded from EU ETS compliance incentives, and strong policy support for RFNBOs contrasts with the near-absence of comparable incentives for other CCU applications. National policy instruments translate EU frameworks into concrete incentives, but their design may reinforce a focus on fuel-based pathways and limit participation of smaller actors. Municipalities can facilitate local value chain development through land-use zoning, and through linking actors, but cannot substitute for missing market-level incentives. We interpret these findings through the lens of coordination failure, organizing them around four interacting mechanisms – demand formation, complementary investment, infrastructure coordination, and multilevel intermediation – that jointly determine whether investment proceeds. Economic viability of bio-CCUS emerges as a systemic outcome that no single actor can bring about alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of greenhouse gas control
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2026.104813
Primary Topic
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision-making and coordination in bio-CCUS value chains: Finnish companies, municipalities, and the role of national and EU-level policy

Lauri Kujanpää, Erika Winquist, Milla Tynkkynen, Satu Lipiäinen et al.
1 links
International journal of greenhouse gas control
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
article

Decision-making and coordination in bio-CCUS value chains: Finnish companies, municipalities, and the role of national and EU-level policy

Lauri Kujanpää, Erika Winquist, Milla Tynkkynen, Satu Lipiäinen, Vilja Varho, Aino Assmuth, Susanna Vanhamäki, Antti Mutanen, Aapo Rautiainen, Riikka Savijärvi
article en

Abstract

Biogenic carbon capture, utilization, and storage (bio-CCUS) is technically feasible and strategically important for climate policy, yet deployment remains largely pre-commercial. While individual bio-CCUS technologies are increasingly well understood, the actor-level dynamics and governance conditions determining value chain formation are less studied. We address that gap through semi-structured interviews with representatives of 13 companies across bio-CCUS value chains and four forerunner municipalities in Finland, characterizing the decision-making environment facing both groups, complemented by an analysis of EU-level and national regulation. The findings reveal that investment in bio-CCUS is primarily constrained by system-level coordination failures: a chicken-and-egg dynamic persists between CO₂ producers waiting for stable demand and users waiting for reliable supply, while missing logistics infrastructure, spatial dependencies, and regulatory fragmentation across legal domains compound the challenge. Biogenic CO₂ is currently largely excluded from EU ETS compliance incentives, and strong policy support for RFNBOs contrasts with the near-absence of comparable incentives for other CCU applications. National policy instruments translate EU frameworks into concrete incentives, but their design may reinforce a focus on fuel-based pathways and limit participation of smaller actors. Municipalities can facilitate local value chain development through land-use zoning, and through linking actors, but cannot substitute for missing market-level incentives. We interpret these findings through the lens of coordination failure, organizing them around four interacting mechanisms – demand formation, complementary investment, infrastructure coordination, and multilevel intermediation – that jointly determine whether investment proceeds. Economic viability of bio-CCUS emerges as a systemic outcome that no single actor can bring about alone.

International journal of greenhouse gas controlVol. 157
Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI), LAB University of Applied Sciences (FI), Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI), VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
Business Finland
Climate action, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon