Sexual Harassment, Power and Barriers to Access to Justice

In the context of workplace sexual harassment, recognizing and addressing the inequalities that Black women face in seeking access to justice remains a pertinent issue. This article discusses aspects of the author’s empirical work on the role of Black women’s intersectional identities in influencing their tendency to seek redress for these harms in England and Wales. It draws on intersectionality theory and Rebecca Sandefur’s framing of inequalities which shape how individuals engage with legal and legal-like institutions. The article refines Sandefur’s understanding of inequalities by demonstrating how different aspects of identity interact with power to influence an individual’s decision about pursuing formal avenues of redress. It argues that the participants’ decisions on whether to seek legal recourse are shaped by their assumptions about judges and lawyers not recognizing their experiences or giving due credibility to their grievances. The participants’ perceptions also influence their willingness to use legal resources to access justice. Keywords: access to justice; intersectionality; sexual harassment; power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Amicus Curiae
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v8i1.5944
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sexual Harassment, Power and Barriers to Access to Justice

Neemah Ahamed
1 links
Amicus Curiae
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

Sexual Harassment, Power and Barriers to Access to Justice

Neemah Ahamed
article en

Abstract

In the context of workplace sexual harassment, recognizing and addressing the inequalities that Black women face in seeking access to justice remains a pertinent issue. This article discusses aspects of the author’s empirical work on the role of Black women’s intersectional identities in influencing their tendency to seek redress for these harms in England and Wales. It draws on intersectionality theory and Rebecca Sandefur’s framing of inequalities which shape how individuals engage with legal and legal-like institutions. The article refines Sandefur’s understanding of inequalities by demonstrating how different aspects of identity interact with power to influence an individual’s decision about pursuing formal avenues of redress. It argues that the participants’ decisions on whether to seek legal recourse are shaped by their assumptions about judges and lawyers not recognizing their experiences or giving due credibility to their grievances. The participants’ perceptions also influence their willingness to use legal resources to access justice. Keywords: access to justice; intersectionality; sexual harassment; power.

Amicus CuriaeVol. 8(1)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Gender equality, Reduced inequalities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Sexual Harassment, Power and Barriers to Access to Justice — Neemah Ahamed · Amicus Curiae (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS