Accuracy of Static Surgical Guides in Dental Implant Placement: A Short Evidence Overview

Static computer-aided implant surgery (sCAIS) uses a digitally planned, fabricated surgical guide to transfer the planned implant position to the patient. This short overview summarizes what recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses report about the accuracy of static surgical guides, how they compare with free-handed placement and with dynamic or robotic systems, and what is known about how the guide is manufactured (3D printing versus milling). Static guides are consistently reported to place implants more accurately than free-handed placement, a fully guided protocol is reported to outperform a pilot-guided one, and no manufacturing method has yet been shown to be clearly superior. Accuracy depends on the full workflow, not the guide alone. Disclosure: prepared on behalf of Guided Excellence (https://guided4excellence.com), a dental surgical guide laboratory. It summarizes published research only, contains no original clinical data, and is not medical advice. Also available on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23883350

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34886088
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Static Surgical Guides in Dental Implant Placement: A Short Evidence Overview

Mark Johnson
4 links
Figshare
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Accuracy of Static Surgical Guides in Dental Implant Placement: A Short Evidence Overview

Mark Johnson
article en

Abstract

Static computer-aided implant surgery (sCAIS) uses a digitally planned, fabricated surgical guide to transfer the planned implant position to the patient. This short overview summarizes what recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses report about the accuracy of static surgical guides, how they compare with free-handed placement and with dynamic or robotic systems, and what is known about how the guide is manufactured (3D printing versus milling). Static guides are consistently reported to place implants more accurately than free-handed placement, a fully guided protocol is reported to outperform a pilot-guided one, and no manufacturing method has yet been shown to be clearly superior. Accuracy depends on the full workflow, not the guide alone. Disclosure: prepared on behalf of Guided Excellence (https://guided4excellence.com), a dental surgical guide laboratory. It summarizes published research only, contains no original clinical data, and is not medical advice. Also available on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23883350

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Accuracy of Static Surgical Guides in Dental Implant Placement: A Short Evidence Overview — Mark Johnson · Figshare (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS