Taxonomic identity and associated revisions of Populus szechuanica var. tibetica

Abstract The genus Populus represents one of the most taxonomically challenging plant groups, with P. szechuanica var. tibetica standing out as a typical representative of such taxonomic perplexity. Extensive taxonomic confusion surrounding this variety involves a multitude of related taxa, which has imposed considerable adverse impacts on the research and utilization of poplar species. In this study, we conducted a long‐term systematic investigation integrating literature review, herbarium specimen examination, morphological analysis, distribution survey, genomic sequencing, and growth trait observation, which has clarified most of the existing taxonomic ambiguities and led to the description of a new species. The fundamental cause of the persistent taxonomic confusion is that the multiple syntypes assigned to P. szechuanica var. tibetica do not belong to a single species: the syntypes collected from Ladakh exhibit distinct morphological characteristics of P. ciliata , while the syntype from western Sichuan is a member of the P. szechuanica species complex. Poplar taxa previously identified as P. szechuanica var. tibetica show remarkable discrepancies in morphology, genetics, habitat adaptation, and phylogenetic relationships. Our findings confirm that P. yatungensis , P. pseudoglauca , and P. wuana originate from natural hybridization between P. ciliata var. gyirongensis and P. curviserrata , whereas P. purdomii , P. xiangchengensi s, and P. haoana derive from natural hybridization between P. szechuanica and P. curviserrata . We therefore propose the following taxonomic treatments: P. szechuanica var. tibetica and P. yatungensis should be recognized as two independent varieties of P. ciliata , and P. purdomii , P. xiangchengensis , and P. haoana should be reduced to the rank of variety under P. szechuanica . Additionally, the native poplar from the middle reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River, putatively derived from natural hybridization among P. ciliata , P. cathayana , and P. curviserrata , is described here as a new species, P. yinii .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Taxon
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.70280
Primary Topic
Plant Diversity and Evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taxonomic identity and associated revisions of Populus szechuanica var. tibetica

Daniel Potter, Fan Zhang, Xueqin Wan, Lianghua Chen et al.
Taxon
Plant Diversity and Evolution
article

Taxonomic identity and associated revisions of Populus szechuanica var. tibetica

Daniel Potter, Fan Zhang, Xueqin Wan, Lianghua Chen, Yujie Shi, Feifei Tian, Jia‐Xuan Mi, Jin‐Liang Huang, Qiao‐Li Peng
article en

Abstract

Abstract The genus Populus represents one of the most taxonomically challenging plant groups, with P. szechuanica var. tibetica standing out as a typical representative of such taxonomic perplexity. Extensive taxonomic confusion surrounding this variety involves a multitude of related taxa, which has imposed considerable adverse impacts on the research and utilization of poplar species. In this study, we conducted a long‐term systematic investigation integrating literature review, herbarium specimen examination, morphological analysis, distribution survey, genomic sequencing, and growth trait observation, which has clarified most of the existing taxonomic ambiguities and led to the description of a new species. The fundamental cause of the persistent taxonomic confusion is that the multiple syntypes assigned to P. szechuanica var. tibetica do not belong to a single species: the syntypes collected from Ladakh exhibit distinct morphological characteristics of P. ciliata , while the syntype from western Sichuan is a member of the P. szechuanica species complex. Poplar taxa previously identified as P. szechuanica var. tibetica show remarkable discrepancies in morphology, genetics, habitat adaptation, and phylogenetic relationships. Our findings confirm that P. yatungensis , P. pseudoglauca , and P. wuana originate from natural hybridization between P. ciliata var. gyirongensis and P. curviserrata , whereas P. purdomii , P. xiangchengensi s, and P. haoana derive from natural hybridization between P. szechuanica and P. curviserrata . We therefore propose the following taxonomic treatments: P. szechuanica var. tibetica and P. yatungensis should be recognized as two independent varieties of P. ciliata , and P. purdomii , P. xiangchengensis , and P. haoana should be reduced to the rank of variety under P. szechuanica . Additionally, the native poplar from the middle reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River, putatively derived from natural hybridization among P. ciliata , P. cathayana , and P. curviserrata , is described here as a new species, P. yinii .

TaxonVol. 75(6)
Sichuan Agricultural University (CN), Taizhou University (CN), Taizhou University (CN), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Plant Diversity and Evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon