Toward a Pedagogy of Care and Vulnerability: A Collaborative Autoethnography of (Dis)Embodiment in the Classroom

Using collaborative autoethnography, this essay explores why and how disembodiment happens in our academic—and especially pedagogical—lives. We mobilize our individual and collective lived experiences toward making visible academia’s inherited logics of Cartesian dualism. Flirting with the anti-method paradigm, we work to reconcile the distance between our ethics as Critical Communication Pedagogues and our classroom practices. In particular, we examine how institutionally imposed expectations of credibility and containment associated with the “ideal instructor body” coerce disembodied pedagogical performances as well as the various ways that we, as multiply marginalized teacher-scholars, navigate such expectations of disembodiment. Made possible by our collective neuroqueer orientation, we end by theorizing a pedagogy of care and vulnerability that reembodies our ethical commitments to relationality, grace, and empathy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Women s Studies in Communication
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2026.2737697
Primary Topic
Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a Pedagogy of Care and Vulnerability: A Collaborative Autoethnography of (Dis)Embodiment in the Classroom

Briana Barner, Hailey Nicole Otis, Kalin Schultz, جنى صبري
1 links
Women s Studies in Communication
Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
article

Toward a Pedagogy of Care and Vulnerability: A Collaborative Autoethnography of (Dis)Embodiment in the Classroom

Briana Barner, Hailey Nicole Otis, Kalin Schultz, جنى صبري
article en

Abstract

Using collaborative autoethnography, this essay explores why and how disembodiment happens in our academic—and especially pedagogical—lives. We mobilize our individual and collective lived experiences toward making visible academia’s inherited logics of Cartesian dualism. Flirting with the anti-method paradigm, we work to reconcile the distance between our ethics as Critical Communication Pedagogues and our classroom practices. In particular, we examine how institutionally imposed expectations of credibility and containment associated with the “ideal instructor body” coerce disembodied pedagogical performances as well as the various ways that we, as multiply marginalized teacher-scholars, navigate such expectations of disembodiment. Made possible by our collective neuroqueer orientation, we end by theorizing a pedagogy of care and vulnerability that reembodies our ethical commitments to relationality, grace, and empathy.

Women s Studies in Communication
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
University of Maryland
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon