Development of a Comprehensive Axisymmetric Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction Validation Case

A new axisymmetric shock/boundary-layer interaction (SBLI) validation case, designed for evaluation of turbulent computational modeling techniques, was developed and is detailed herein. A recently obtained experimental data set for a SBLI generated by a 16-deg cone and with approach Mach number of 2.5 was obtained utilizing multiple measurement techniques. These measurements focused not only on the SBLI region but also upstream to detail the inflow boundary condition state for computational simulations. An axisymmetric configuration was employed to remove sidewall effects, which have plagued studies of nominally planar two-dimensional SBLIs in rectangular test sections. Three established Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solvers were evaluated in the validation effort, using two broadly used eddy-viscosity RANS turbulence models, the Spalart–Allmaras one-equation and Menter Shear Stress Transport (SST) two-equation formulations. Computational peculiarities of specific turbulence models implementations in the three codes and effects on solutions are detailed. Grid sensitivities were also investigated. Additionally, an evaluation of variants of the Menter [Formula: see text] family of models was also conducted. The shear stress limiter implicit to the SST model was observed to have significant effect on the resultant SBLI predictions. The results of this effort have produced a new validation case for the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIAA Journal
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j067364
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Comprehensive Axisymmetric Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction Validation Case

Layton W. Howerton, Nicholas J. Georgiadis, Heath H. Reising, David J. Friedlander
2 links
AIAA Journal
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
article

Development of a Comprehensive Axisymmetric Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction Validation Case

Layton W. Howerton, Nicholas J. Georgiadis, Heath H. Reising, David J. Friedlander
article en

Abstract

A new axisymmetric shock/boundary-layer interaction (SBLI) validation case, designed for evaluation of turbulent computational modeling techniques, was developed and is detailed herein. A recently obtained experimental data set for a SBLI generated by a 16-deg cone and with approach Mach number of 2.5 was obtained utilizing multiple measurement techniques. These measurements focused not only on the SBLI region but also upstream to detail the inflow boundary condition state for computational simulations. An axisymmetric configuration was employed to remove sidewall effects, which have plagued studies of nominally planar two-dimensional SBLIs in rectangular test sections. Three established Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solvers were evaluated in the validation effort, using two broadly used eddy-viscosity RANS turbulence models, the Spalart–Allmaras one-equation and Menter Shear Stress Transport (SST) two-equation formulations. Computational peculiarities of specific turbulence models implementations in the three codes and effects on solutions are detailed. Grid sensitivities were also investigated. Additionally, an evaluation of variants of the Menter [Formula: see text] family of models was also conducted. The shear stress limiter implicit to the SST model was observed to have significant effect on the resultant SBLI predictions. The results of this effort have produced a new validation case for the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource.

AIAA Journal
Glenn Research Center (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon