Whose Time Do Traffic Signals Save? Pedestrian–Vehicle Delay Tradeoffs Across Sydney Intersections

At 168 Sydney intersections, estimated pedestrian delay averages 39.8 seconds per crossing if everyone waits for Walk, or 29.8 seconds under observed crossing behavior, compared with 10.4 seconds per detected vehicle. We test earlier pedestrian service while holding pedestrian and vehicle volumes at their current levels. With a 30-second first-call wait target, the 95-site experiment saves 440 pedestrian-hours but adds 886 vehicle-hours, assuming full Walk compliance. At 1.2 occupants per vehicle, pedestrian waiting must count more than 2.42 times as much as vehicle-occupant waiting for the weighted time savings to exceed the added delay. In the seven-day experiment at 35 intersections, the weighted time savings exceed the added delay when pedestrian waiting counts more than 2.22 times as much as vehicle-occupant waiting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Findings
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.172237
Primary Topic
Traffic control and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whose Time Do Traffic Signals Save? Pedestrian–Vehicle Delay Tradeoffs Across Sydney Intersections

David Matthew Levinson
Findings
Traffic control and management
article

Whose Time Do Traffic Signals Save? Pedestrian–Vehicle Delay Tradeoffs Across Sydney Intersections

David Matthew Levinson
article en

Abstract

At 168 Sydney intersections, estimated pedestrian delay averages 39.8 seconds per crossing if everyone waits for Walk, or 29.8 seconds under observed crossing behavior, compared with 10.4 seconds per detected vehicle. We test earlier pedestrian service while holding pedestrian and vehicle volumes at their current levels. With a 30-second first-call wait target, the 95-site experiment saves 440 pedestrian-hours but adds 886 vehicle-hours, assuming full Walk compliance. At 1.2 occupants per vehicle, pedestrian waiting must count more than 2.42 times as much as vehicle-occupant waiting for the weighted time savings to exceed the added delay. In the seven-day experiment at 35 intersections, the weighted time savings exceed the added delay when pedestrian waiting counts more than 2.22 times as much as vehicle-occupant waiting.

Findings
The University of Sydney (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Traffic control and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon