Denervation Techniques for Chronic Low Back Pain due to Lumbar Facet Joint Arthropathy: A Comparison Between Radiofrequency and Endoscopic Neurotomy

PURPOSE: Radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) of the lumbar medial branch is the standard of care for facet joint arthropathy-related chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, endoscopic neurotomy (EN) has also recently been adopted as a feasible treatment option for CLBP. The increasing population of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) highlights the need for alternative denervation methods to avoid device interference. We propose that both RFN and EN are effective for CLBP, with EN offering a safe option for patients with CIEDs and therapy-resistant aberrant innervation. METHODS: Patients with facet joint arthropathy-related CLBP who were treated between 01.01.2016 and 31.12.2019 were prospectively included and grouped as RFN or EN based on treatment. Over a 12-month period, the following outcomes were studied: Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI-back), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), complications, and costs. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (35 female) with a median age of 62 years were included. Prior to the intervention, patients had a median COMI-back of 8.6 (IQR: 7.7-9.0) and a median VAS score of 8.0 (IQR: 7.0-9.0). After intervention, the VAS score dropped significantly for both groups. Thereafter, pain scores rose in the EN group, whereas VAS levels in the RFN group remained unaltered. Complication rates were significantly lower after RFN compared with EN patients (p < 0.007). Total costs were significantly lower for the RFN group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this prospective study shows that both EN and percutaneous multilevel RFN are safe and effective treatments for facet joint arthropathy-associated CLBP. RFN is preferred as the first treatment option for uncomplicated CLBP due to its lower invasiveness, while EN is suitable as an alternative for patients with CIEDs and those with therapy-resistant aberrant innervation or anatomical variations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain Practice
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70217
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Denervation Techniques for Chronic Low Back Pain due to Lumbar Facet Joint Arthropathy: A Comparison Between Radiofrequency and Endoscopic Neurotomy

Alba Shehu, Stavros Oikonomidis, Rolf Sobottke, Anas Afifi et al.
Pain Practice
Pain Management and Treatment
article

Denervation Techniques for Chronic Low Back Pain due to Lumbar Facet Joint Arthropathy: A Comparison Between Radiofrequency and Endoscopic Neurotomy

Alba Shehu, Stavros Oikonomidis, Rolf Sobottke, Anas Afifi, Michel Paul Johan Teuben, Mohamad Agha Mahmoud, M.J. Ringe, Mohammed Abujarad
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) of the lumbar medial branch is the standard of care for facet joint arthropathy-related chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, endoscopic neurotomy (EN) has also recently been adopted as a feasible treatment option for CLBP. The increasing population of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) highlights the need for alternative denervation methods to avoid device interference. We propose that both RFN and EN are effective for CLBP, with EN offering a safe option for patients with CIEDs and therapy-resistant aberrant innervation. METHODS: Patients with facet joint arthropathy-related CLBP who were treated between 01.01.2016 and 31.12.2019 were prospectively included and grouped as RFN or EN based on treatment. Over a 12-month period, the following outcomes were studied: Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI-back), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), complications, and costs. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (35 female) with a median age of 62 years were included. Prior to the intervention, patients had a median COMI-back of 8.6 (IQR: 7.7-9.0) and a median VAS score of 8.0 (IQR: 7.0-9.0). After intervention, the VAS score dropped significantly for both groups. Thereafter, pain scores rose in the EN group, whereas VAS levels in the RFN group remained unaltered. Complication rates were significantly lower after RFN compared with EN patients (p < 0.007). Total costs were significantly lower for the RFN group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this prospective study shows that both EN and percutaneous multilevel RFN are safe and effective treatments for facet joint arthropathy-associated CLBP. RFN is preferred as the first treatment option for uncomplicated CLBP due to its lower invasiveness, while EN is suitable as an alternative for patients with CIEDs and those with therapy-resistant aberrant innervation or anatomical variations.

Pain PracticeVol. 26(8)
Anhalt University of Applied Sciences (DE), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon