Assessment of the 2022 Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome Diagnostic Criteria Using the International Replication Repair Deficiency Consortium

Purpose Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRD) syndrome, caused by inherited biallelic mismatch repair (MMR) gene loss, is characterized by early-onset cancers and neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) features. Genetic heterogeneity of syndromes with replication repair deficiency (RRD) and non-RRD conditions (eg, Lynch syndrome (LS) and NF1, respectively) leads to diagnostic challenges. Seven diagnostic criteria (CMMRD1-CMMRD7) were established in 2022 incorporating germline results, ancillary tests, and clinical manifestation. This study reviews the use of these criteria in identifying CMMRD. Methods Individuals suspected of CMMRD referred to the International Replication Repair Deficiency Consortium in Toronto, Canada, had clinical manifestation, family history, germline, MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) of non-neoplastic (NN-IHC) and tumor tissue, and LOGIC obtained to assess the diagnostic criteria. Results A total of 580 individuals were identified, with 159 excluded because of insufficient information resulting in 421 individuals assessed using the diagnostic criteria. Of these, 358 (85%) were classified as CMMRD/suspected CMMRD (n = 270), LS/likely LS (n = 78), or other hereditary conditions (n = 10). Sixty-three individuals could not be classified because of the lack of or discordant results. Of the 270 patients with CMMRD syndrome, 241 met the published criteria and 29 were suspected of CMMRD on the basis of fulfilling criteria with a discordant functional result or suspicious genotype/phenotype. CMMRD1-CMMRD7 criteria were all identified, with 57% (n = 137) fulfilling CMMRD1 criteria. Early-onset gliomas and GI cancers occurred in LS, POLE , TP53 , and NF1. Digenic LS and concurrent hereditary cancer syndromes were identified. Conclusion The 2022 CMMRD syndrome diagnostic criteria provided a useful framework for establishing CMMRD syndrome and distinguishing it from similar conditions. A clinically meaningful subset remained difficult to classify despite suspicion of CMMRD. Refinement of CMMRD syndrome diagnostic criteria may address atypical presentation and discordant functional results. Limitations include incomplete availability of germline/functional testing, discordant/inconclusive results, and inherent referral bias to a specialized RRD consortium.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Precision Oncology
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/po-26-00979
Primary Topic
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the 2022 Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome Diagnostic Criteria Using the International Replication Repair Deficiency Consortium

Lucie K. Stengs, Melissa Edwards, Uri Y. Tabori, Miriam Bornhorst et al.
JCO Precision Oncology
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
article

Assessment of the 2022 Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome Diagnostic Criteria Using the International Replication Repair Deficiency Consortium

Lucie K. Stengs, Melissa Edwards, Uri Y. Tabori, Miriam Bornhorst, Vanessa Bianchi, Jiil Chung, Bryson W. Katona, Anirban Das, Logine Negm, Cynthia E Hawkins, Daniel C. Bowers, Melyssa D. Aronson, Yosef E. Maruvka, Noah Jacobsen, Jadyn Moussadji, Nicole K. Gygi
article en

Abstract

Purpose Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRD) syndrome, caused by inherited biallelic mismatch repair (MMR) gene loss, is characterized by early-onset cancers and neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) features. Genetic heterogeneity of syndromes with replication repair deficiency (RRD) and non-RRD conditions (eg, Lynch syndrome (LS) and NF1, respectively) leads to diagnostic challenges. Seven diagnostic criteria (CMMRD1-CMMRD7) were established in 2022 incorporating germline results, ancillary tests, and clinical manifestation. This study reviews the use of these criteria in identifying CMMRD. Methods Individuals suspected of CMMRD referred to the International Replication Repair Deficiency Consortium in Toronto, Canada, had clinical manifestation, family history, germline, MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) of non-neoplastic (NN-IHC) and tumor tissue, and LOGIC obtained to assess the diagnostic criteria. Results A total of 580 individuals were identified, with 159 excluded because of insufficient information resulting in 421 individuals assessed using the diagnostic criteria. Of these, 358 (85%) were classified as CMMRD/suspected CMMRD (n = 270), LS/likely LS (n = 78), or other hereditary conditions (n = 10). Sixty-three individuals could not be classified because of the lack of or discordant results. Of the 270 patients with CMMRD syndrome, 241 met the published criteria and 29 were suspected of CMMRD on the basis of fulfilling criteria with a discordant functional result or suspicious genotype/phenotype. CMMRD1-CMMRD7 criteria were all identified, with 57% (n = 137) fulfilling CMMRD1 criteria. Early-onset gliomas and GI cancers occurred in LS, POLE , TP53 , and NF1. Digenic LS and concurrent hereditary cancer syndromes were identified. Conclusion The 2022 CMMRD syndrome diagnostic criteria provided a useful framework for establishing CMMRD syndrome and distinguishing it from similar conditions. A clinically meaningful subset remained difficult to classify despite suspicion of CMMRD. Refinement of CMMRD syndrome diagnostic criteria may address atypical presentation and discordant functional results. Limitations include incomplete availability of germline/functional testing, discordant/inconclusive results, and inherent referral bias to a specialized RRD consortium.

JCO Precision OncologyVol. 10(11)
Mount Sinai Hospital (CA), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), University of Toronto (CA), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), Sarasota Memorial Health Care System (US), Sarasota Memorial Hospital (US), Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon