Model-Based Evaluation of Dynamic Safety Control for Human–Robot Collaboration

In this paper we explore how a safety controller on a robot reacts to a person passing near it when sensor data arrives to it in a delayed manner. The work is concentrated on a 2D-model involving a fixed-speed controller and dynamic controller in three situations, namely a person passing the path of the vehicle, passing diagonally toward the vehicle, and a slowly passing person, and comparing results. Each run keeps track of the minimum separation distance between the robot and person and occurrences wherein they collide, and also distance and time spent around the safety threshold (around minimum distance), besides average speed of robot. For each test, the minimum separation distance, number of collision points, time inside range and average robot speed are recorded. Both the crossing and slow-approach have no collisions under the dynamic controller. The static collision for the crossing test at -0.281 is replaced with a comfortable safety margin of 1.263m. The Diagonal still collides with minimum clearance of -0.628m. Slowing down a robot with delayed distance readings becomes safer in the simplest cases, failing when person future movement goes unnoted by the controller.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/ire1724591
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model-Based Evaluation of Dynamic Safety Control for Human–Robot Collaboration

M. P. Anbarasi, Ritesh G, Jaivant N
1 links
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
article

Model-Based Evaluation of Dynamic Safety Control for Human–Robot Collaboration

M. P. Anbarasi, Ritesh G, Jaivant N
article en

Abstract

In this paper we explore how a safety controller on a robot reacts to a person passing near it when sensor data arrives to it in a delayed manner. The work is concentrated on a 2D-model involving a fixed-speed controller and dynamic controller in three situations, namely a person passing the path of the vehicle, passing diagonally toward the vehicle, and a slowly passing person, and comparing results. Each run keeps track of the minimum separation distance between the robot and person and occurrences wherein they collide, and also distance and time spent around the safety threshold (around minimum distance), besides average speed of robot. For each test, the minimum separation distance, number of collision points, time inside range and average robot speed are recorded. Both the crossing and slow-approach have no collisions under the dynamic controller. The static collision for the crossing test at -0.281 is replaced with a comfortable safety margin of 1.263m. The Diagonal still collides with minimum clearance of -0.628m. Slowing down a robot with delayed distance readings becomes safer in the simplest cases, failing when person future movement goes unnoted by the controller.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 10(5)
PSG College of Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Model-Based Evaluation of Dynamic Safety Control for Human–Robot Collaboration — M. P. Anbarasi, Ritesh G, et al. · Iconic Research and Engineering Journals (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS