Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours toward evidence-based practice among healthcare professionals in Kuwait: a cross-sectional study

Objectives To assess and compare evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge, attitudes and behaviours among physicians, occupational therapists, physical therapists and nurses in Kuwait and to identify modifiable correlates of EBP implementation. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Six governmental hospitals, one in each of Kuwait’s six governorates; data were collected from May to September 2025. Participants 365 licensed clinicians with at least 1 year of clinical experience (occupational therapists n=81; physical therapists n=108; nurses n=94; physicians n=82), recruited through hospital department heads. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcomes were the five domains of the Evidence-Based Practice Profile Questionnaire (EBP2) (relevance, sympathy, terminology, practice and confidence), standardised to 0–100. Secondary outcomes were differences by profession, English fluency, EBP training and gender (Welch’s tests) and independent predictors of domain scores (multivariable linear regression). Results Standardised mean scores were highest for relevance (93.9; 95% CI 93.2 to 94.6) and lowest for practice (46.4; 95% CI 43.9 to 48.6). Professions differed significantly on all five domains (p≤0.004), with the largest effect for practice (η² = 0.194). Physicians and occupational therapists outperformed physical therapists and nurses, particularly on terminology, confidence and practice. After adjustment, English fluency independently predicted higher terminology, confidence and practice scores; prior EBP training predicted higher sympathy but lower practice scores; and longer duration of practice predicted lower relevance scores. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings. Conclusions EBP utilisation in Kuwait was low to moderate, with the largest gaps in actual practice; even physicians did not reach the high-performance threshold on most domains. English fluency was the most consistent modifiable correlate of EBP knowledge, confidence and behaviour, whereas prior EBP training was linked to higher sympathy but not to more frequent EBP behaviours. Institution-wide implementation strategies, clinically integrated EBP training and multilingual evidence resources are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-123672
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours toward evidence-based practice among healthcare professionals in Kuwait: a cross-sectional study

Musaed Z. Alnaser, Najla Alsiri, Mohammad Alshehab, Hamad Habeeb Alhamad
BMJ Open
Health Sciences Research and Education
article

Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours toward evidence-based practice among healthcare professionals in Kuwait: a cross-sectional study

Musaed Z. Alnaser, Najla Alsiri, Mohammad Alshehab, Hamad Habeeb Alhamad
article en

Abstract

Objectives To assess and compare evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge, attitudes and behaviours among physicians, occupational therapists, physical therapists and nurses in Kuwait and to identify modifiable correlates of EBP implementation. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Six governmental hospitals, one in each of Kuwait’s six governorates; data were collected from May to September 2025. Participants 365 licensed clinicians with at least 1 year of clinical experience (occupational therapists n=81; physical therapists n=108; nurses n=94; physicians n=82), recruited through hospital department heads. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcomes were the five domains of the Evidence-Based Practice Profile Questionnaire (EBP2) (relevance, sympathy, terminology, practice and confidence), standardised to 0–100. Secondary outcomes were differences by profession, English fluency, EBP training and gender (Welch’s tests) and independent predictors of domain scores (multivariable linear regression). Results Standardised mean scores were highest for relevance (93.9; 95% CI 93.2 to 94.6) and lowest for practice (46.4; 95% CI 43.9 to 48.6). Professions differed significantly on all five domains (p≤0.004), with the largest effect for practice (η² = 0.194). Physicians and occupational therapists outperformed physical therapists and nurses, particularly on terminology, confidence and practice. After adjustment, English fluency independently predicted higher terminology, confidence and practice scores; prior EBP training predicted higher sympathy but lower practice scores; and longer duration of practice predicted lower relevance scores. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings. Conclusions EBP utilisation in Kuwait was low to moderate, with the largest gaps in actual practice; even physicians did not reach the high-performance threshold on most domains. English fluency was the most consistent modifiable correlate of EBP knowledge, confidence and behaviour, whereas prior EBP training was linked to higher sympathy but not to more frequent EBP behaviours. Institution-wide implementation strategies, clinically integrated EBP training and multilingual evidence resources are needed.

BMJ OpenVol. 16(11)
Kuwait University (KW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health Sciences Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon