Learning from the two gurus: Rethinking semi-structured interviews in sensitive contexts

Semi-structured interviews are often described as flexible tools in qualitative research, yet the contexts in which interviewing occurs can exceed the contingencies of the field that the researcher has anticipated or prepared for. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with acid attack survivors in India, this note examines such contingencies through a fieldwork encounter in which an interview with two survivors unfolded in the presence of family members and through the co-construction of their narratives. What initially appeared as methodological anomalies prompted questions about how contextual and relational realities enter the interview space and how researchers might respond when they cannot be fully anticipated or controlled. Through the metaphor of the “two gurus”—research objectives and research participants—the note reflects on how attending to both can reorient methodological responses to such anomalies. Rather than advocating one or other form of interviewing, it argues that, in sensitive contexts, methodological rigor may lie less in controlling the interview environment and more in remaining responsive to the conditions through which experience becomes sayable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941261503398
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning from the two gurus: Rethinking semi-structured interviews in sensitive contexts

Mridusmita Bhagawati
Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Learning from the two gurus: Rethinking semi-structured interviews in sensitive contexts

Mridusmita Bhagawati
article en

Abstract

Semi-structured interviews are often described as flexible tools in qualitative research, yet the contexts in which interviewing occurs can exceed the contingencies of the field that the researcher has anticipated or prepared for. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with acid attack survivors in India, this note examines such contingencies through a fieldwork encounter in which an interview with two survivors unfolded in the presence of family members and through the co-construction of their narratives. What initially appeared as methodological anomalies prompted questions about how contextual and relational realities enter the interview space and how researchers might respond when they cannot be fully anticipated or controlled. Through the metaphor of the “two gurus”—research objectives and research participants—the note reflects on how attending to both can reorient methodological responses to such anomalies. Rather than advocating one or other form of interviewing, it argues that, in sensitive contexts, methodological rigor may lie less in controlling the interview environment and more in remaining responsive to the conditions through which experience becomes sayable.

Qualitative Research
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon