Perceiving, wanting, and choosing: Consumer psychology of healthy food choice

Abstract To help address the global obesity pandemic, extensive research in consumer psychology has studied what encourages (un)healthy food and portion choice. The present paper organizes this body of work into two predominant agendas: influencing (un)healthy food and portion choice through factors that shape healthiness perception or doing so through factors that modulate healthiness motivation and self‐control . Extant research has overwhelmingly relied on dichotomous choice measures (pitting healthy options against tasty but unhealthy alternatives) or on portion choice and intake (treating smaller amounts as healthier). Based on this observation, this review suggests at least two areas in which future research could provide important novel insights: first, investigating factors that impact the variety of foods that consumers choose (instead of dichotomous choice) as well as how the variety of food elements impacts perceptions and choice; and second, examining factors that enhance alignment of healthiness and tastiness perceptions (instead of forcing a tradeoff ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Consumer Psychology Review
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.70016
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceiving, wanting, and choosing: Consumer psychology of healthy food choice

Linda Hagen
Consumer Psychology Review
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Perceiving, wanting, and choosing: Consumer psychology of healthy food choice

Linda Hagen
article en

Abstract

Abstract To help address the global obesity pandemic, extensive research in consumer psychology has studied what encourages (un)healthy food and portion choice. The present paper organizes this body of work into two predominant agendas: influencing (un)healthy food and portion choice through factors that shape healthiness perception or doing so through factors that modulate healthiness motivation and self‐control . Extant research has overwhelmingly relied on dichotomous choice measures (pitting healthy options against tasty but unhealthy alternatives) or on portion choice and intake (treating smaller amounts as healthier). Based on this observation, this review suggests at least two areas in which future research could provide important novel insights: first, investigating factors that impact the variety of foods that consumers choose (instead of dichotomous choice) as well as how the variety of food elements impacts perceptions and choice; and second, examining factors that enhance alignment of healthiness and tastiness perceptions (instead of forcing a tradeoff ).

Consumer Psychology Review
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon