Lack of Dynamic Gains From Agricultural Trade: Implications for Economic Development of Food‐Deficit Low‐Income Countries

ABSTRACT This paper examines whether agricultural trade liberalization fosters agricultural and economic development in net food‐importing countries in sub‐Saharan Africa. Insights from the new trade literature suggest that while manufacturing often realizes dynamic productivity gains from trade through firm‐level competition and innovation, such mechanisms are largely absent in agriculture. In sub‐Saharan Africa, productivity improvements are unlikely to result from freer trade or intensified market competition among farm producers. Instead, sustained public investment in infrastructure, institutional development, extension services, and research and development remains the primary driver of growth. Thus, whereas productivity growth in manufacturing is primarily firm‐driven, in agriculture it is shaped by state policies and public investment. The key policy implication is that agricultural trade liberalization should not be prioritized as a development strategy in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Development Economics
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.70229
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lack of Dynamic Gains From Agricultural Trade: Implications for Economic Development of Food‐Deficit Low‐Income Countries

Wanki Moon
Review of Development Economics
Global trade and economics
article

Lack of Dynamic Gains From Agricultural Trade: Implications for Economic Development of Food‐Deficit Low‐Income Countries

Wanki Moon
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines whether agricultural trade liberalization fosters agricultural and economic development in net food‐importing countries in sub‐Saharan Africa. Insights from the new trade literature suggest that while manufacturing often realizes dynamic productivity gains from trade through firm‐level competition and innovation, such mechanisms are largely absent in agriculture. In sub‐Saharan Africa, productivity improvements are unlikely to result from freer trade or intensified market competition among farm producers. Instead, sustained public investment in infrastructure, institutional development, extension services, and research and development remains the primary driver of growth. Thus, whereas productivity growth in manufacturing is primarily firm‐driven, in agriculture it is shaped by state policies and public investment. The key policy implication is that agricultural trade liberalization should not be prioritized as a development strategy in the region.

Review of Development Economics
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Lack of Dynamic Gains From Agricultural Trade: Implications for Economic Development of Food‐Deficit Low‐Income Countries — Wanki Moon · Review of Development Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS