Salvage esophagectomy versus photodynamic therapy for localized residual or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy: a single-center comparative study

BACKGROUND: Salvage esophagectomy is considered the standard curative treatment for localized residual or recurrent esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), but it is associated with substantial morbidity. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as a less invasive alternative. We compared the outcomes of salvage esophagectomy and PDT for localized residual or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after definitive CRT or radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 91 patients with cT1-2N0M0 residual or recurrent ESCC after definitive CRT or RT who underwent salvage esophagectomy (n = 33) or PDT (n = 58) at a single institution. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and treatment-related outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients treated with PDT were significantly older and had a higher comorbidity burden than those undergoing salvage esophagectomy. Salvage esophagectomy achieved an R0 resection rate of 94.0% but was associated with severe postoperative complications in 48.5% of patients, including one treatment-related death. In the PDT group, initial local complete response was achieved in 74.1% of patients, with one grade 3 adverse event and no treatment-related mortality. No significant differences were observed between the groups in OS (p = 0.597) or DSS (p = 0.670). CONCLUSIONS: This study does not establish equivalence or non-inferiority between PDT and salvage esophagectomy. PDT demonstrated a favorable safety profile and may offer an organ-preserving salvage treatment option for carefully selected patients with localized residual or recurrent ESCC after definitive CRT or RT, particularly those unsuitable for surgery because of advanced age, substantial comorbidities, or limited surgical tolerance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-026-02533-y
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Salvage esophagectomy versus photodynamic therapy for localized residual or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy: a single-center comparative study

Yohei Ozawa, Hirotaka Ishida, Michiaki Unno, Yusuke Taniyama et al.
Journal of Gastroenterology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Salvage esophagectomy versus photodynamic therapy for localized residual or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy: a single-center comparative study

Yohei Ozawa, Hirotaka Ishida, Michiaki Unno, Yusuke Taniyama, Naoto Ujiie, Takashi Kamei, Chiaki Sato, Hiroshi Okamoto
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Salvage esophagectomy is considered the standard curative treatment for localized residual or recurrent esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), but it is associated with substantial morbidity. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as a less invasive alternative. We compared the outcomes of salvage esophagectomy and PDT for localized residual or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after definitive CRT or radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 91 patients with cT1-2N0M0 residual or recurrent ESCC after definitive CRT or RT who underwent salvage esophagectomy (n = 33) or PDT (n = 58) at a single institution. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and treatment-related outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients treated with PDT were significantly older and had a higher comorbidity burden than those undergoing salvage esophagectomy. Salvage esophagectomy achieved an R0 resection rate of 94.0% but was associated with severe postoperative complications in 48.5% of patients, including one treatment-related death. In the PDT group, initial local complete response was achieved in 74.1% of patients, with one grade 3 adverse event and no treatment-related mortality. No significant differences were observed between the groups in OS (p = 0.597) or DSS (p = 0.670). CONCLUSIONS: This study does not establish equivalence or non-inferiority between PDT and salvage esophagectomy. PDT demonstrated a favorable safety profile and may offer an organ-preserving salvage treatment option for carefully selected patients with localized residual or recurrent ESCC after definitive CRT or RT, particularly those unsuitable for surgery because of advanced age, substantial comorbidities, or limited surgical tolerance.

Journal of Gastroenterology
Tohoku University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon