Governance as strategy, not checklist: Why agentic governance must rise with autonomy. A feedback submission on the Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI (v1.5)

This paper is a feedback submission to IMDA on the Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI (Version 1.5). While the framework explicitly takes into account that governance needs to be devised upfront for agentic ai and outlines four principles: assessing risks upfront, making humans meaningfully accountable, implementing technical & process controls, and enabling end-user responsibility - designing the agents with a matrix on action-space and autonomy axes, when applied through a lens of GRC (governance, risk, and compliance), the framework’s top-level human oversight can be setup as an exception-based observation for the most autonomously acting multi-agent systems carrying the greatest business risk, receiving the non-stringent governance (as indicated in the MSD case study for calibrating governance processes to level of agency). The submission argues for treating governance as strategy: a board-owned capability that rises with autonomy even as human involvement in each action falls.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23706660
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance as strategy, not checklist: Why agentic governance must rise with autonomy. A feedback submission on the Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI (v1.5)

Bharath Yadla
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Governance as strategy, not checklist: Why agentic governance must rise with autonomy. A feedback submission on the Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI (v1.5)

Bharath Yadla
article en

Abstract

This paper is a feedback submission to IMDA on the Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI (Version 1.5). While the framework explicitly takes into account that governance needs to be devised upfront for agentic ai and outlines four principles: assessing risks upfront, making humans meaningfully accountable, implementing technical & process controls, and enabling end-user responsibility - designing the agents with a matrix on action-space and autonomy axes, when applied through a lens of GRC (governance, risk, and compliance), the framework’s top-level human oversight can be setup as an exception-based observation for the most autonomously acting multi-agent systems carrying the greatest business risk, receiving the non-stringent governance (as indicated in the MSD case study for calibrating governance processes to level of agency). The submission argues for treating governance as strategy: a board-owned capability that rises with autonomy even as human involvement in each action falls.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon