Integrated primary health care for chronic diseases in Nigeria: a qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives on policy frameworks and emerging approaches

Abstract Background and objective Globally, the integration of chronic disease (CD) care into primary health care (PHC) is guided by health policies that aim to enhance the continuity and coordination of care with the goal of providing more holistic, efficient, and person-centred care to people living with CDs. In Nigeria, little information is available regarding the progress of the integrated primary health care (IPHC) concept. The objective of this study is to understand how IPHC for people with CDs is considered in national and regional health policy frameworks in Nigeria as well as to provide insights into current approaches used in IPHC practice in the southeast region of Nigeria. Methods Semistructured face-to-face, written and telephone-based interviews were conducted with 14 stakeholders involved in health policy development at the national, state and local government levels across five states in southeastern Nigeria and the federal capital territory Abuja. The interview data were analysed on the basis of a deductive-inductive qualitative content analysis. Results The findings of this research reveal that although national health policies in Nigeria recognize the value of IPHC for people with CDs, dedicated IPHC policies remain underdeveloped. The stakeholders highlighted existing national and international health policy frameworks that shape IPHC practices but expressed the concern that implementation suffers from weak operational guidance and limited coordination, especially at subnational levels. The currently promising IPHC approaches that were identified mainly included state-, community- and NGO-led programmes. However, these approaches remain regionally and locally concentrated and face challenges in terms of scale and sustainability because of limited policy anchoring as well as gaps between health policy intent and implementation. Conclusion Nigeria appears to lack a formalized, widely dispersed IPHC policy framework that can be used to address the specific needs of people with chronic conditions and achieve universal health coverage. Targeted strategies should focus on the development of cohesive national IPHC policies that can be adapted to diverse regions in Nigeria. Future research on IPHC should include frontline health workers such as nurses and community health workers who provide care on the ground in PHC centres. Understanding their experiences can help bridge the gap between policy visions and implementation in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-16017-5
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated primary health care for chronic diseases in Nigeria: a qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives on policy frameworks and emerging approaches

Kerstin Hämel, Maria Oluomachi Enebeli
2 links
BMC Health Services Research
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Integrated primary health care for chronic diseases in Nigeria: a qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives on policy frameworks and emerging approaches

Kerstin Hämel, Maria Oluomachi Enebeli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and objective Globally, the integration of chronic disease (CD) care into primary health care (PHC) is guided by health policies that aim to enhance the continuity and coordination of care with the goal of providing more holistic, efficient, and person-centred care to people living with CDs. In Nigeria, little information is available regarding the progress of the integrated primary health care (IPHC) concept. The objective of this study is to understand how IPHC for people with CDs is considered in national and regional health policy frameworks in Nigeria as well as to provide insights into current approaches used in IPHC practice in the southeast region of Nigeria. Methods Semistructured face-to-face, written and telephone-based interviews were conducted with 14 stakeholders involved in health policy development at the national, state and local government levels across five states in southeastern Nigeria and the federal capital territory Abuja. The interview data were analysed on the basis of a deductive-inductive qualitative content analysis. Results The findings of this research reveal that although national health policies in Nigeria recognize the value of IPHC for people with CDs, dedicated IPHC policies remain underdeveloped. The stakeholders highlighted existing national and international health policy frameworks that shape IPHC practices but expressed the concern that implementation suffers from weak operational guidance and limited coordination, especially at subnational levels. The currently promising IPHC approaches that were identified mainly included state-, community- and NGO-led programmes. However, these approaches remain regionally and locally concentrated and face challenges in terms of scale and sustainability because of limited policy anchoring as well as gaps between health policy intent and implementation. Conclusion Nigeria appears to lack a formalized, widely dispersed IPHC policy framework that can be used to address the specific needs of people with chronic conditions and achieve universal health coverage. Targeted strategies should focus on the development of cohesive national IPHC policies that can be adapted to diverse regions in Nigeria. Future research on IPHC should include frontline health workers such as nurses and community health workers who provide care on the ground in PHC centres. Understanding their experiences can help bridge the gap between policy visions and implementation in practice.

BMC Health Services Research
University of Vienna (AT), Bielefeld University (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon