How should rhythmic discontinuous murals in extra-long tunnels be evaluated? Evidence from driving simulation

Extra-long tunnels are visually monotonous environments that may weaken drivers’ visual references and affect vehicle control. Tunnel sidewall murals can provide additional visual information, yet the effects of mural rhythm and discontinuous deployment on driver responses remain insufficiently quantified. This study evaluated discontinuous mural rhythm schemes in an extra-long tunnel using a driving simulation experiment. Six mural rhythm schemes were designed, and vehicle operation and eye-tracking data were collected from 27 licensed drivers. Indicators of visual search, visual workload, longitudinal control, and lateral control were analyzed. To compare the schemes, this study used a three-stage ANOVA-FCE-SPA framework: repeated-measures ANOVA examined indicator-level differences, FCE generated whole-tunnel and sectional rankings, and SPA described the identity, discrepancy, and opposition patterns observed alongside those rankings. The results showed that discontinuous mural rhythm affected visual processing, speed regulation, and lateral control, with heterogeneous responses across indicators. Fixation duration, pupil-related indicators, lateral position, and steering wheel angle were more sensitive to rhythm variations, whereas speed- and acceleration-related indicators mainly reflected local responses. FCE showed spatial variation in integrated performance: the no-mural scheme A1 ranked highest for the whole tunnel, M1, and M2, whereas A4 ranked highest in M3, indicating that the relative performance of the tested schemes varied across tunnel sections. Set pair analysis further characterized relative indicator-state patterns across schemes and tunnel sections, with lateral position, steering wheel angle, and pupil-related indicators showing greater scheme- and section-specific variation. The ANOVA–FCE–SPA framework integrates indicator-level response analysis, comprehensive scheme evaluation across spatial scales, and structural interpretation of multi-indicator response patterns. It provides a quantitative basis for selecting mural rhythm parameters and optimizing tunnel sidewall visual environments in extra-long tunnels.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34887016
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How should rhythmic discontinuous murals in extra-long tunnels be evaluated? Evidence from driving simulation

Wenhui Dong, Zhiqing Zhang, Xiaohua Zhao, Nale Zhao et al.
4 links
Figshare
Traffic and Road Safety
article

How should rhythmic discontinuous murals in extra-long tunnels be evaluated? Evidence from driving simulation

Wenhui Dong, Zhiqing Zhang, Xiaohua Zhao, Nale Zhao, Qiqi Liu
article en

Abstract

Extra-long tunnels are visually monotonous environments that may weaken drivers’ visual references and affect vehicle control. Tunnel sidewall murals can provide additional visual information, yet the effects of mural rhythm and discontinuous deployment on driver responses remain insufficiently quantified. This study evaluated discontinuous mural rhythm schemes in an extra-long tunnel using a driving simulation experiment. Six mural rhythm schemes were designed, and vehicle operation and eye-tracking data were collected from 27 licensed drivers. Indicators of visual search, visual workload, longitudinal control, and lateral control were analyzed. To compare the schemes, this study used a three-stage ANOVA-FCE-SPA framework: repeated-measures ANOVA examined indicator-level differences, FCE generated whole-tunnel and sectional rankings, and SPA described the identity, discrepancy, and opposition patterns observed alongside those rankings. The results showed that discontinuous mural rhythm affected visual processing, speed regulation, and lateral control, with heterogeneous responses across indicators. Fixation duration, pupil-related indicators, lateral position, and steering wheel angle were more sensitive to rhythm variations, whereas speed- and acceleration-related indicators mainly reflected local responses. FCE showed spatial variation in integrated performance: the no-mural scheme A1 ranked highest for the whole tunnel, M1, and M2, whereas A4 ranked highest in M3, indicating that the relative performance of the tested schemes varied across tunnel sections. Set pair analysis further characterized relative indicator-state patterns across schemes and tunnel sections, with lateral position, steering wheel angle, and pupil-related indicators showing greater scheme- and section-specific variation. The ANOVA–FCE–SPA framework integrates indicator-level response analysis, comprehensive scheme evaluation across spatial scales, and structural interpretation of multi-indicator response patterns. It provides a quantitative basis for selecting mural rhythm parameters and optimizing tunnel sidewall visual environments in extra-long tunnels.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon