Evaluating the Validity of AI-Generated Writing Feedback for Students With Learning Disabilities

Students with learning disabilities need clear, direct, and useful writing feedback. However, teachers often find it hard to provide this consistently because of time and workload pressures. New developments in generative artificial intelligence (AI) might help improve both the frequency and quality of feedback for students. Still, we know very little about whether AI-generated comments are valid or useful for struggling writers. This qualitative study looked at teachers' views on writing feedback from the AI-SCORE automated writing evaluation tool. Nine upper elementary and middle school teachers took part in two focus groups. They reviewed AI-generated feedback on student informational writing. They also discussed its clarity, teaching value, and suitability for students with disabilities. Thematic analysis revealed several areas for improving AI-generated feedback. Teachers want more guidance on specific revisions, language that suits students’ development, a consistent tone, and alignment with writing goals. They shared cautious optimism, noting that AI feedback could enhance teaching capacity and provide more practice opportunities for students, if it meets their needs. The findings stress the importance of teacher involvement, the potential benefits of AI for writing instruction, and key factors for creating AI tools that effectively support students with learning disabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Special Education Technology
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434261498189
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Validity of AI-Generated Writing Feedback for Students With Learning Disabilities

Sean J. Smith, Adam Carreon, Samantha R. Goldman
2 links
Journal of Special Education Technology
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Evaluating the Validity of AI-Generated Writing Feedback for Students With Learning Disabilities

Sean J. Smith, Adam Carreon, Samantha R. Goldman
article en

Abstract

Students with learning disabilities need clear, direct, and useful writing feedback. However, teachers often find it hard to provide this consistently because of time and workload pressures. New developments in generative artificial intelligence (AI) might help improve both the frequency and quality of feedback for students. Still, we know very little about whether AI-generated comments are valid or useful for struggling writers. This qualitative study looked at teachers' views on writing feedback from the AI-SCORE automated writing evaluation tool. Nine upper elementary and middle school teachers took part in two focus groups. They reviewed AI-generated feedback on student informational writing. They also discussed its clarity, teaching value, and suitability for students with disabilities. Thematic analysis revealed several areas for improving AI-generated feedback. Teachers want more guidance on specific revisions, language that suits students’ development, a consistent tone, and alignment with writing goals. They shared cautious optimism, noting that AI feedback could enhance teaching capacity and provide more practice opportunities for students, if it meets their needs. The findings stress the importance of teacher involvement, the potential benefits of AI for writing instruction, and key factors for creating AI tools that effectively support students with learning disabilities.

Journal of Special Education Technology
University of Kansas (US), Georgia Southern University (US)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon