Awareness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safety among Healthcare Workers: A Cross-sectional Study from Pune, Maharashtra, India

Introduction: The safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a paramount concern in contemporary healthcare, as the strong magnetic fields and radiofrequency energy bring about particular hazards. Healthcare Workers (HCWs) need adequate knowledge, a positive attitude, and consistent safe practices to prevent adverse events related to MRI. Tertiary care hospitals are particularly high-risk environments because of the volume and complexity of imaging performed. Aim: To assess awareness, knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding MRI safety among HCWs. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India, from November 2025 to March 2026. Convenience sampling was used to recruit 47 HCWs who had received MRI safety training. A structured, self-administered questionnaire assessed socio-demographic profiles, knowledge, attitudes, practices, and awareness across zones: Knowledge domain: six questions; Attitude domain: three questions; Practice domain: three questions; MRI Zone Awareness: five questions. Results: Most participants were aged 25-30 years (n=31, 66.0%), and most were physicians (n=29, 61.7%). General knowledge was good, with (n=45, 95.7%) correctly identifying MRI at involving non-ionising radiation and (n=47, 100%) correctly identifying metal objects as the main MRI hazard. However, a significant gap emerged: only (n=19, 40.4%) correctly categorised pacemakers and cochlear implants as unsafe in MRI, while (n=25, 53.2%) incorrectly considered them safe. Attitudes were strongly positive, with (n=43, 91.5%) strongly agreeing that MRI safety is important. Adherence to patient safety practices was 100%. Overall awareness of MRI safety zones was relatively good, although substantial misunderstanding of zone restrictions was observed. Conclusion: HCWs demonstrated high general MRI safety awareness and positive attitudes; however, critical gaps remained in implant safety knowledge and incident-reporting culture.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2026/91596.24729
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Awareness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safety among Healthcare Workers: A Cross-sectional Study from Pune, Maharashtra, India

Amita Digambar Dabholkar, Shreya Gujar, Dipali Kandalkar, Mrunal Kangane et al.
3 links
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Awareness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safety among Healthcare Workers: A Cross-sectional Study from Pune, Maharashtra, India

Amita Digambar Dabholkar, Shreya Gujar, Dipali Kandalkar, Mrunal Kangane, Rutuja Jadhav
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a paramount concern in contemporary healthcare, as the strong magnetic fields and radiofrequency energy bring about particular hazards. Healthcare Workers (HCWs) need adequate knowledge, a positive attitude, and consistent safe practices to prevent adverse events related to MRI. Tertiary care hospitals are particularly high-risk environments because of the volume and complexity of imaging performed. Aim: To assess awareness, knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding MRI safety among HCWs. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India, from November 2025 to March 2026. Convenience sampling was used to recruit 47 HCWs who had received MRI safety training. A structured, self-administered questionnaire assessed socio-demographic profiles, knowledge, attitudes, practices, and awareness across zones: Knowledge domain: six questions; Attitude domain: three questions; Practice domain: three questions; MRI Zone Awareness: five questions. Results: Most participants were aged 25-30 years (n=31, 66.0%), and most were physicians (n=29, 61.7%). General knowledge was good, with (n=45, 95.7%) correctly identifying MRI at involving non-ionising radiation and (n=47, 100%) correctly identifying metal objects as the main MRI hazard. However, a significant gap emerged: only (n=19, 40.4%) correctly categorised pacemakers and cochlear implants as unsafe in MRI, while (n=25, 53.2%) incorrectly considered them safe. Attitudes were strongly positive, with (n=43, 91.5%) strongly agreeing that MRI safety is important. Adherence to patient safety practices was 100%. Overall awareness of MRI safety zones was relatively good, although substantial misunderstanding of zone restrictions was observed. Conclusion: HCWs demonstrated high general MRI safety awareness and positive attitudes; however, critical gaps remained in implant safety knowledge and incident-reporting culture.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon