Field characterization of urban road traffic noise sources: effects of road class and vehicle composition

Routine road traffic noise assessment describes the source by traffic volume, speed and vehicle-category shares, whereas monitoring usually reports a measured source-side level with a total vehicle count only, so that the operating conditions behind that level remain unidentified. This paper addresses that gap with a multi-city field study of 25 urban road sections in Guangzhou, China, covering four road classes and three operating periods. Each section-period was measured three times for 20 min with Class 1 instrumentation and counted by vehicle class, giving 75 observations analyzed with an explicit metrological and statistical treatment. Levels ranged from 58.5 to 79.8 dB(A); arterial sections alone spanned 15.0 dB(A) and night-time measurements 21.3 dB(A). Vehicle-class flow was more strongly associated with L A e q than average speed, medium-vehicle flow showing the strongest association ( r = 0.867, 95 % CI 0.797-0.914). The expanded uncertainty of a single level was about 0.8 dB ( k = 2). The results support recording vehicle-class counts alongside L A e q , so that a measured level can be attributed to traffic volume, fleet composition or both.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vibroengineering PROCEDIA
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2026.26984
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field characterization of urban road traffic noise sources: effects of road class and vehicle composition

Wen Zhang, Ying Xu, Yuan Zheng, Xiaogang Liu et al.
Vibroengineering PROCEDIA
Noise Effects and Management
article

Field characterization of urban road traffic noise sources: effects of road class and vehicle composition

Wen Zhang, Ying Xu, Yuan Zheng, Xiaogang Liu, Chunzheng Liu
article en

Abstract

Routine road traffic noise assessment describes the source by traffic volume, speed and vehicle-category shares, whereas monitoring usually reports a measured source-side level with a total vehicle count only, so that the operating conditions behind that level remain unidentified. This paper addresses that gap with a multi-city field study of 25 urban road sections in Guangzhou, China, covering four road classes and three operating periods. Each section-period was measured three times for 20 min with Class 1 instrumentation and counted by vehicle class, giving 75 observations analyzed with an explicit metrological and statistical treatment. Levels ranged from 58.5 to 79.8 dB(A); arterial sections alone spanned 15.0 dB(A) and night-time measurements 21.3 dB(A). Vehicle-class flow was more strongly associated with L A e q than average speed, medium-vehicle flow showing the strongest association ( r = 0.867, 95 % CI 0.797-0.914). The expanded uncertainty of a single level was about 0.8 dB ( k = 2). The results support recording vehicle-class counts alongside L A e q , so that a measured level can be attributed to traffic volume, fleet composition or both.

Vibroengineering PROCEDIAVol. 65
Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province (CN), Guangzhou Urban Planning Survey & Design Institute (CN), Guangdong Province Environmental Monitoring Center (CN), Early Warning (United States) (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon