From Pathways to Portfolios: A Multi-Criteria Investment Approach to Circular EV Battery Innovation

This study develops an investment portfolio of circular innovation projects in the electric vehicle battery sector within the context of the sustainable transformation of the automotive industry. The central research problem concerns the allocation of limited investment resources across alternative circular pathways while simultaneously accounting for economic performance, investment risk, and social and environmental effects. The theoretical and methodological foundation of the study was established through a structured literature search organized in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 framework. A total of 5110 records published between 2010 and 2026 were identified in Scopus; following deduplication and thematic screening, 656 publications were retained for subsequent systematization. Based on the literature analysis, five classes of circular innovation projects were identified: battery diagnostics and lifetime extension; repair, refurbishment, and remanufacturing; reuse and second-life applications; collection, disassembly, and reverse logistics; and recycling and material recovery. A multi-criteria portfolio model was developed to evaluate these alternatives jointly, incorporating economic performance, investment risk, social effects, and environmental effects. The scenario-based application showed that the individual optima for the respective criteria do not coincide. The economically preferred combination includes lifetime extension, remanufacturing, and recycling, whereas the compromise solution consists of second life, reverse logistics, and recycling/material recovery. Sensitivity analysis showed that second life and recycling/material recovery remain part of the compromise portfolios under changes in the assumed investment constraint. The findings support a shift from selecting a single circular pathway toward forming a portfolio of complementary innovation directions, enabling the alignment of economic, social, and environmental sustainability priorities and creating conditions for the sustainable innovative development of automotive enterprises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182111156
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Pathways to Portfolios: A Multi-Criteria Investment Approach to Circular EV Battery Innovation

Dmitry I. Ryakhovsky, Sergey Vladimirovich Shmanev, Alexander Chupin, Morkovkin Dmitry et al.
5 links
Sustainability
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

From Pathways to Portfolios: A Multi-Criteria Investment Approach to Circular EV Battery Innovation

Dmitry I. Ryakhovsky, Sergey Vladimirovich Shmanev, Alexander Chupin, Morkovkin Dmitry, Е. V. Vasilyeva, Остроумов Владимир Владиславович
article en

Abstract

This study develops an investment portfolio of circular innovation projects in the electric vehicle battery sector within the context of the sustainable transformation of the automotive industry. The central research problem concerns the allocation of limited investment resources across alternative circular pathways while simultaneously accounting for economic performance, investment risk, and social and environmental effects. The theoretical and methodological foundation of the study was established through a structured literature search organized in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 framework. A total of 5110 records published between 2010 and 2026 were identified in Scopus; following deduplication and thematic screening, 656 publications were retained for subsequent systematization. Based on the literature analysis, five classes of circular innovation projects were identified: battery diagnostics and lifetime extension; repair, refurbishment, and remanufacturing; reuse and second-life applications; collection, disassembly, and reverse logistics; and recycling and material recovery. A multi-criteria portfolio model was developed to evaluate these alternatives jointly, incorporating economic performance, investment risk, social effects, and environmental effects. The scenario-based application showed that the individual optima for the respective criteria do not coincide. The economically preferred combination includes lifetime extension, remanufacturing, and recycling, whereas the compromise solution consists of second life, reverse logistics, and recycling/material recovery. Sensitivity analysis showed that second life and recycling/material recovery remain part of the compromise portfolios under changes in the assumed investment constraint. The findings support a shift from selecting a single circular pathway toward forming a portfolio of complementary innovation directions, enabling the alignment of economic, social, and environmental sustainability priorities and creating conditions for the sustainable innovative development of automotive enterprises.

SustainabilityVol. 18(21)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU), Financial University (RU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Responsible consumption and production, Affordable and clean energy, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon