Artificial intelligence and the erosion of professional autonomy in clinical practice – a review and analysis

Professional autonomy is a foundational ethical principle in healthcare, underpinning healthcare professionals’ capacity to exercise independent clinical judgement in light of a patient's particular circumstances, preferences and needs. While ethical debate surrounding medical AI has focused extensively on safety, accuracy and bias, its implications for professional autonomy have received comparatively less attention, a notable omission given AI's growing role in shaping clinical decision-making. This article identifies three salient mechanisms through which AI integration may constrain professional autonomy: (1) algorithmic opacity and explainability, (2) automation bias and de-skilling and (3) institutional pressures. Whilst proposed safeguards such as explainable AI, professional training, system design and institutional governance represent important directions, they do not yet adequately protect professional autonomy. This article therefore calls for closer scrutiny of current approaches to AI integration and for governance frameworks that attend not only to the technical properties of AI systems, but to the organisational and institutional conditions in which they are deployed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Ethics
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509261504217
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence and the erosion of professional autonomy in clinical practice – a review and analysis

Georgette Gavey
3 links
Clinical Ethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial intelligence and the erosion of professional autonomy in clinical practice – a review and analysis

Georgette Gavey
article en

Abstract

Professional autonomy is a foundational ethical principle in healthcare, underpinning healthcare professionals’ capacity to exercise independent clinical judgement in light of a patient's particular circumstances, preferences and needs. While ethical debate surrounding medical AI has focused extensively on safety, accuracy and bias, its implications for professional autonomy have received comparatively less attention, a notable omission given AI's growing role in shaping clinical decision-making. This article identifies three salient mechanisms through which AI integration may constrain professional autonomy: (1) algorithmic opacity and explainability, (2) automation bias and de-skilling and (3) institutional pressures. Whilst proposed safeguards such as explainable AI, professional training, system design and institutional governance represent important directions, they do not yet adequately protect professional autonomy. This article therefore calls for closer scrutiny of current approaches to AI integration and for governance frameworks that attend not only to the technical properties of AI systems, but to the organisational and institutional conditions in which they are deployed.

Clinical Ethics
University of Manchester (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Artificial intelligence and the erosion of professional autonomy in clinical practice – a review and analysis — Georgette Gavey · Clinical Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS