Collapse-Resistant Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures: A Controlled Comparison of SIGReg, VICReg, and EMA

Joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPA) learn representations by predicting the embedding of a target view from a context view, which makes them prone to representation collapse. Several stabilizers have been proposed, including exponential moving averages (EMA), variance-invariance-covariance regularization (VICReg), and isotropic Gaussian regularization (SIGReg). Comparisons in the literature often rely on single runs and differ in training budget. We propose a controlled protocol that compares these three stabilizers under identical architectures, budgets, and at least five random seeds, and that measures collapse with an intrinsic-dimension estimate on known synthetic manifolds and on sentence-embedding benchmarks. On synthetic manifolds, all three methods recover low intrinsic dimensions, but all underestimate at d=32, where VICReg retains the most embedding rank. Vision and language results are pending. Preprint. Results in this version come from small-scale pilot experiments; the full experimental protocol is described in the text and is pending.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23890643
Primary Topic
Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Collapse-Resistant Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures: A Controlled Comparison of SIGReg, VICReg, and EMA

Dheiver Francisco Santos
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
preprint

Collapse-Resistant Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures: A Controlled Comparison of SIGReg, VICReg, and EMA

Dheiver Francisco Santos
preprint en

Abstract

Joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPA) learn representations by predicting the embedding of a target view from a context view, which makes them prone to representation collapse. Several stabilizers have been proposed, including exponential moving averages (EMA), variance-invariance-covariance regularization (VICReg), and isotropic Gaussian regularization (SIGReg). Comparisons in the literature often rely on single runs and differ in training budget. We propose a controlled protocol that compares these three stabilizers under identical architectures, budgets, and at least five random seeds, and that measures collapse with an intrinsic-dimension estimate on known synthetic manifolds and on sentence-embedding benchmarks. On synthetic manifolds, all three methods recover low intrinsic dimensions, but all underestimate at d=32, where VICReg retains the most embedding rank. Vision and language results are pending. Preprint. Results in this version come from small-scale pilot experiments; the full experimental protocol is described in the text and is pending.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon