Multimodal prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), but response varies greatly among patients. Existing predictive models often neglect host-related factors such as body composition. This study aimed to develop and validate a multimodal model integrating clinical, tumor radiomics, and body composition features to predict NAC response. A total of 1,568 LAGC patients were analyzed, including 1,150 from six centers for model development and validation, 352 in a real-world incremental cohort, and 66 from two prospective trials (ChiCTR2000030414 and NCT03718624). Radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment CT scans of tumors and L3-level body composition. Feature selection included statistical testing and LASSO regression. A multimodal ensemble model (NeoGEM) was constructed by integrating clinical and radiomic features. NeoGEM achieved high performance in the training cohort (AUC = 0.888; accuracy = 0.809) and showed comparable discrimination across internal (AUC = 0.870–0.875), external (AUC = 0.859–0.877), and prospective cohorts (AUC = 0.864–0.867). The model demonstrated stable predictive performance across different chemotherapy regimens and treatment cycle subgroups. In the incremental real-world cohort, where radiological rather than pathological response was used, NeoGEM also maintained good discrimination (AUC = 0.840), providing supportive evidence of broader clinical applicability. NeoGEM achieved higher AUCs than the clinical, tumor-only, and body-composition-only models across the validation cohorts examined. NeoGEM score stratification was associated with 5-year OS (35.5% vs. 62.4%) and DFS (21.5% vs. 50.8%) in the low vs. high NeoGEM score groups ( P < 0.001). Exploratory transcriptomic analysis suggested immune-related pathway enrichment and higher infiltration of CD4+, CD8+, and FCGR3A+ cells in tumors from high NeoGEM score patients. NeoGEM showed consistently good discrimination across retrospective, external, and small prospective validation settings, suggesting potential utility for response stratification in patients with LAGC. The integration of body-composition radiomics may improve predictive performance and provide additional host-related biological context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-05123-0
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study

Qun Zhao, Ding Ping’an, Jiaxuan Yang, Lilong Zhang et al.
BMC Medicine
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Multimodal prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study

Qun Zhao, Ding Ping’an, Jiaxuan Yang, Lilong Zhang, Honghai Guo, Yihao Yang, Sheng Chen, Sen Yang, Renjun Gu, Hong Long, Yuan Tian, Shuo Ma, Ning Meng, Xiaolong Li, Lingjiao Meng
article en

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), but response varies greatly among patients. Existing predictive models often neglect host-related factors such as body composition. This study aimed to develop and validate a multimodal model integrating clinical, tumor radiomics, and body composition features to predict NAC response. A total of 1,568 LAGC patients were analyzed, including 1,150 from six centers for model development and validation, 352 in a real-world incremental cohort, and 66 from two prospective trials (ChiCTR2000030414 and NCT03718624). Radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment CT scans of tumors and L3-level body composition. Feature selection included statistical testing and LASSO regression. A multimodal ensemble model (NeoGEM) was constructed by integrating clinical and radiomic features. NeoGEM achieved high performance in the training cohort (AUC = 0.888; accuracy = 0.809) and showed comparable discrimination across internal (AUC = 0.870–0.875), external (AUC = 0.859–0.877), and prospective cohorts (AUC = 0.864–0.867). The model demonstrated stable predictive performance across different chemotherapy regimens and treatment cycle subgroups. In the incremental real-world cohort, where radiological rather than pathological response was used, NeoGEM also maintained good discrimination (AUC = 0.840), providing supportive evidence of broader clinical applicability. NeoGEM achieved higher AUCs than the clinical, tumor-only, and body-composition-only models across the validation cohorts examined. NeoGEM score stratification was associated with 5-year OS (35.5% vs. 62.4%) and DFS (21.5% vs. 50.8%) in the low vs. high NeoGEM score groups ( P < 0.001). Exploratory transcriptomic analysis suggested immune-related pathway enrichment and higher infiltration of CD4+, CD8+, and FCGR3A+ cells in tumors from high NeoGEM score patients. NeoGEM showed consistently good discrimination across retrospective, external, and small prospective validation settings, suggesting potential utility for response stratification in patients with LAGC. The integration of body-composition radiomics may improve predictive performance and provide additional host-related biological context.

BMC Medicine
Hebei Medical University (CN), Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command (CN), Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Hebei General Hospital (CN), First Hospital of Shijiazhuang (CN), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China (CN), Baoding No.1 Central Hospital (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon