Can artificial intelligence (AI) make ethical decisions? Engineering and social science perspectives.

The increasing reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) to make decisions that affect everyday human life raises important questions about whether people believe AI is capable of moral agency-a feature of intelligent beings-and functions as an autonomous ethical decision maker.We propose that differences in such beliefs are in significant part a function of educational and professional pathways.Specifically, we hypothesize that individuals exposed to engineering-oriented disciplinary pathways, as compared to social scienceoriented pathways, are more likely to believe that AI is capable of a conscious capacity for moral reasoning, awareness, and responsibility for its decisions.To test this hypothesis, we first developed and validated an initial scale to measure such differences in belief and then examined these beliefs across a series of studies.We find that students in engineering programs, employees in engineering-related work sectors, and participants exposed to a problem-solving orientation stereotypical of an engineer are more likely to believe that AI is capable of being an autonomous ethical decision maker compared to their social science-oriented counterparts.We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings for AI development and deployment and the associated importance of having diverse disciplinary perspectives represented to manage potential risks and rewards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology Mind and Behavior
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000220
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can artificial intelligence (AI) make ethical decisions? Engineering and social science perspectives.

Christopher Wong Michaelson, Alain Van Hiel, Mahak Nagpal, Shane Schweitzer et al.
1 links
Technology Mind and Behavior
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Can artificial intelligence (AI) make ethical decisions? Engineering and social science perspectives.

Christopher Wong Michaelson, Alain Van Hiel, Mahak Nagpal, Shane Schweitzer, David De Cremer A
article en

Abstract

The increasing reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) to make decisions that affect everyday human life raises important questions about whether people believe AI is capable of moral agency-a feature of intelligent beings-and functions as an autonomous ethical decision maker.We propose that differences in such beliefs are in significant part a function of educational and professional pathways.Specifically, we hypothesize that individuals exposed to engineering-oriented disciplinary pathways, as compared to social scienceoriented pathways, are more likely to believe that AI is capable of a conscious capacity for moral reasoning, awareness, and responsibility for its decisions.To test this hypothesis, we first developed and validated an initial scale to measure such differences in belief and then examined these beliefs across a series of studies.We find that students in engineering programs, employees in engineering-related work sectors, and participants exposed to a problem-solving orientation stereotypical of an engineer are more likely to believe that AI is capable of being an autonomous ethical decision maker compared to their social science-oriented counterparts.We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings for AI development and deployment and the associated importance of having diverse disciplinary perspectives represented to manage potential risks and rewards.

Technology Mind and Behavior
HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE), Northeastern University (US), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), University of St. Thomas - Minnesota (US), Ghent University (BE), Thomas University (US)
National University of Singapore
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon