How Does Framing Shape Public Support for Transgender Exclusion in Elite Sport? - Evidence From a German Survey Experiment

The inclusion of transgender athletes is one of the most contested issues in sport today. Drawing on original survey data from Germany, this study examines how framing, gender, and political values shape public attitudes toward transgender participation in elite sport. Using a vignette-based design and ordered logistic panel regressions, we manipulate inclusion versus fairness framing and examine responses across gender and political orientation. The results indicate that fairness framing tends to increase support for exclusionary regulations relative to inclusion framing, extending prior US-based evidence to Europe. Notably, men are more likely than women to oppose transgender inclusion, and this gender gap is significantly moderated by political values: polarization concentrates among conservative-leaning women, while men’s opposition remains stable regardless of political orientation. The findings point to a value-moderated form of gender polarization. We discuss implications for policy communication and design, sport governing bodies, and future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication & Sport
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795261500396
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Does Framing Shape Public Support for Transgender Exclusion in Elite Sport? - Evidence From a German Survey Experiment

Mara Verena Konjer, Michael Mutz, Henk Erik Meier, Swantje Müller
4 links
Communication & Sport
Sports, Gender, and Society
article

How Does Framing Shape Public Support for Transgender Exclusion in Elite Sport? - Evidence From a German Survey Experiment

Mara Verena Konjer, Michael Mutz, Henk Erik Meier, Swantje Müller
article en

Abstract

The inclusion of transgender athletes is one of the most contested issues in sport today. Drawing on original survey data from Germany, this study examines how framing, gender, and political values shape public attitudes toward transgender participation in elite sport. Using a vignette-based design and ordered logistic panel regressions, we manipulate inclusion versus fairness framing and examine responses across gender and political orientation. The results indicate that fairness framing tends to increase support for exclusionary regulations relative to inclusion framing, extending prior US-based evidence to Europe. Notably, men are more likely than women to oppose transgender inclusion, and this gender gap is significantly moderated by political values: polarization concentrates among conservative-leaning women, while men’s opposition remains stable regardless of political orientation. The findings point to a value-moderated form of gender polarization. We discuss implications for policy communication and design, sport governing bodies, and future research.

Communication & Sport
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), University of Münster (DE)
Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft
Reduced inequalities, Gender equality, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports, Gender, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
How Does Framing Shape Public Support for Transgender Exclusion in Elite Sport? - Evidence From a German Survey Experiment — Mara Verena Konjer, Michael Mutz, et al. · Communication & Sport (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS