Documented dietitian consultation in hospitalized underweight adults varies more by admitting diagnosis than by nutritional severity: a retrospective single-center study

Background Disease-related malnutrition is common in hospitalized adults and is associated with worse outcomes, but nutritional care begins only when a dietitian sees the patient. Without a protocolized admission screen, referral rests on clinician discretion. We described documented dietitian consultation among underweight adults at a Saudi tertiary center with no admission nutrition screening protocol. Methods We screened 126,267 admissions between 2017 and 2022 and analyzed 381 non-pregnant, non-smoking adults aged 18–55 years without cancer, diabetes, hypertension, or critical illness, with a recorded stay of at least 5 days and admission body mass index below 18.5 kg/m 2 ; only the first eligible admission per patient was retained. The outcome was a completed dietitian consultation documented in the record. We described its prevalence, timing, and distribution across ICD-10 chapters, and modeled correlates with Firth penalized logistic regression. Length of stay was examined descriptively. Reporting followed STROBE. Results A consultation was documented in 141 of 381 patients (37.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 32.3–42.0), and within 24 h in 54 (14.2%, 95% CI 11.0–18.0; 38.3% of those consulted). Consultation ranged from 6.5% (blood and immune-system disorders) to 60% (congenital conditions; omnibus p = 0.0005). In the multivariable model, consultation was associated with body mass index (adjusted odds ratio 1.36 per 1 kg/m 2 lower, 95% CI 1.20–1.56) and admitting diagnosis (global penalized likelihood-ratio p < 0.001). Relative to respiratory admissions, blood and immune-system diagnoses were least likely to be consulted (adjusted odds ratio 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.56; adjusted absolute difference 23.7 percentage points, 95% CI 10.7–36.2). There was no statistical evidence of a length-of-stay difference by consultation timing (median difference 0.8 days shorter with early consultation, 95% CI 4.0 shorter–2.1 longer; p = 0.63). Conclusion Under discretionary referral, consultation varied roughly ninefold across admitting diagnoses and was associated more strongly with diagnostic category than with nutritional severity. Because no protocol defined which patients should have been seen, these data cannot establish whether 37% represents under-provision. Standardized admission screening with a defined referral trigger could reduce this dependence and requires prospective evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Nutrition
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2026.1958331
Primary Topic
Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Documented dietitian consultation in hospitalized underweight adults varies more by admitting diagnosis than by nutritional severity: a retrospective single-center study

Majid Althaqafy, Dalal O. Tammar, Amal M. Thaiban, Riham M. Alghamdi et al.
1 links
Frontiers in Nutrition
Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
article

Documented dietitian consultation in hospitalized underweight adults varies more by admitting diagnosis than by nutritional severity: a retrospective single-center study

Majid Althaqafy, Dalal O. Tammar, Amal M. Thaiban, Riham M. Alghamdi, Sara A. Alalyani
article en

Abstract

Background Disease-related malnutrition is common in hospitalized adults and is associated with worse outcomes, but nutritional care begins only when a dietitian sees the patient. Without a protocolized admission screen, referral rests on clinician discretion. We described documented dietitian consultation among underweight adults at a Saudi tertiary center with no admission nutrition screening protocol. Methods We screened 126,267 admissions between 2017 and 2022 and analyzed 381 non-pregnant, non-smoking adults aged 18–55 years without cancer, diabetes, hypertension, or critical illness, with a recorded stay of at least 5 days and admission body mass index below 18.5 kg/m 2 ; only the first eligible admission per patient was retained. The outcome was a completed dietitian consultation documented in the record. We described its prevalence, timing, and distribution across ICD-10 chapters, and modeled correlates with Firth penalized logistic regression. Length of stay was examined descriptively. Reporting followed STROBE. Results A consultation was documented in 141 of 381 patients (37.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 32.3–42.0), and within 24 h in 54 (14.2%, 95% CI 11.0–18.0; 38.3% of those consulted). Consultation ranged from 6.5% (blood and immune-system disorders) to 60% (congenital conditions; omnibus p = 0.0005). In the multivariable model, consultation was associated with body mass index (adjusted odds ratio 1.36 per 1 kg/m 2 lower, 95% CI 1.20–1.56) and admitting diagnosis (global penalized likelihood-ratio p < 0.001). Relative to respiratory admissions, blood and immune-system diagnoses were least likely to be consulted (adjusted odds ratio 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.56; adjusted absolute difference 23.7 percentage points, 95% CI 10.7–36.2). There was no statistical evidence of a length-of-stay difference by consultation timing (median difference 0.8 days shorter with early consultation, 95% CI 4.0 shorter–2.1 longer; p = 0.63). Conclusion Under discretionary referral, consultation varied roughly ninefold across admitting diagnoses and was associated more strongly with diagnostic category than with nutritional severity. Because no protocol defined which patients should have been seen, these data cannot establish whether 37% represents under-provision. Standardized admission screening with a defined referral trigger could reduce this dependence and requires prospective evaluation.

Frontiers in NutritionVol. 13
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon