T-cell engagers in solid tumors: challenges and emerging strategies

T-cell engagers (TCEs) redirect endogenous T cells toward malignant cells by simultaneously binding a tumor-associated target and a T-cell receptor component, most commonly CD3, thereby inducing immune-synapse formation and cytotoxicity independently of conventional antigen recognition. Although TCEs have transformed the treatment of several hematologic malignancies, their development in solid tumors remain limited by heterogeneous and non–tumor-specific antigen expression, impaired tumor penetration and T-cell trafficking, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and immune-mediated toxicities. This review examines the structural and mechanistic foundations of TCE activity, including antibody fragment–based constructs, IgG-like bispecific antibodies, T-cell receptor–based engagers, and emerging multispecific platforms. We discuss how molecular size, valency, geometry, epitope location, binding affinity, and pharmacokinetic engineering influence immune-synapse quality, antitumor potency, cytokine release, tissue distribution. Major barrier efficacy, including on-target, off-tumor toxicity, antigen heterogeneity and escape, restricted T-cell infiltration, T-cell exhaustion, and metabolic and immunologic suppression are critically evaluated. The evolving clinical landscape across major solid tumors is reviewed, with emphasis on tebentafusp in metastatic uveal melanoma and tarlatamab in previously treated small-cell lung cancer, illustrating the importance of aligning target biology, molecular format, and dosing strategy. We also address cytokine release syndrome, neurologic toxicity, resistance, and treatment failure and highlight strategies designed to widen the therapeutic window and sustain antitumor activity, including step-up dosing, affinity and avidity tuning, conditional or protease-activated constructs, dual-target and trispecific platforms, localized or genetically encoded delivery, rational combinations, and predictive biomarkers. Together, these advances are positioning TCEs as an increasingly adaptable and durable therapeutic platform for solid tumors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1956728
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

T-cell engagers in solid tumors: challenges and emerging strategies

Chinmay Jani, Marijo Bilušić, Ruchi Tusharkumar Jani, Xena Zheng et al.
5 links
Frontiers in Immunology
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

T-cell engagers in solid tumors: challenges and emerging strategies

Chinmay Jani, Marijo Bilušić, Ruchi Tusharkumar Jani, Xena Zheng, Jose Forero
article en

Abstract

T-cell engagers (TCEs) redirect endogenous T cells toward malignant cells by simultaneously binding a tumor-associated target and a T-cell receptor component, most commonly CD3, thereby inducing immune-synapse formation and cytotoxicity independently of conventional antigen recognition. Although TCEs have transformed the treatment of several hematologic malignancies, their development in solid tumors remain limited by heterogeneous and non–tumor-specific antigen expression, impaired tumor penetration and T-cell trafficking, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and immune-mediated toxicities. This review examines the structural and mechanistic foundations of TCE activity, including antibody fragment–based constructs, IgG-like bispecific antibodies, T-cell receptor–based engagers, and emerging multispecific platforms. We discuss how molecular size, valency, geometry, epitope location, binding affinity, and pharmacokinetic engineering influence immune-synapse quality, antitumor potency, cytokine release, tissue distribution. Major barrier efficacy, including on-target, off-tumor toxicity, antigen heterogeneity and escape, restricted T-cell infiltration, T-cell exhaustion, and metabolic and immunologic suppression are critically evaluated. The evolving clinical landscape across major solid tumors is reviewed, with emphasis on tebentafusp in metastatic uveal melanoma and tarlatamab in previously treated small-cell lung cancer, illustrating the importance of aligning target biology, molecular format, and dosing strategy. We also address cytokine release syndrome, neurologic toxicity, resistance, and treatment failure and highlight strategies designed to widen the therapeutic window and sustain antitumor activity, including step-up dosing, affinity and avidity tuning, conditional or protease-activated constructs, dual-target and trispecific platforms, localized or genetically encoded delivery, rational combinations, and predictive biomarkers. Together, these advances are positioning TCEs as an increasingly adaptable and durable therapeutic platform for solid tumors.

Frontiers in ImmunologyVol. 17
University of Miami (US), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon