Equality and symmetry breaking in a planar octagon family

For the origin-symmetric octagons Lε,t = conv{±(1,0), ±(0,1), ±(1−tε,1−ε), ±(−1+ε,2ε)}, we compare the vertex index V, which permits arbitrary finite enclosing polygons, with its origin-centered quadrilateral restriction W. For each fixed real t and all sufficiently small positive ε, exact equality V = W holds when t < √2−1 or t ≥ √2/3. For √2−1 < t < √2/3, the gap is W(Lε,t) − V(Lε,t) = (1−t)(t−√2+1)ε2/(4√2) + O(ε3) > 0. At t = √2−1, the first nonzero term is instead (23√2−32)ε3/16, with remainder O(ε4). A moving-facet gauge plateau controls arbitrary nearby enclosures; exact product monotonicity centers the competing orientation. Matching feasible polygons yield scalar envelopes of the actual indices. This provisional candidate classification is conditional on the previously obtained minimum, genuine-pentagon bound and complete equality classification for the limiting affine-regular hexagon. No effective parameter cutoff, uniform classification across the transitions or classification of all optimizing polygons is claimed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23886037
Primary Topic
Point processes and geometric inequalities
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Equality and symmetry breaking in a planar octagon family

Robert Barritz
6 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Point processes and geometric inequalities
preprint

Equality and symmetry breaking in a planar octagon family

Robert Barritz
preprint en

Abstract

For the origin-symmetric octagons Lε,t = conv{±(1,0), ±(0,1), ±(1−tε,1−ε), ±(−1+ε,2ε)}, we compare the vertex index V, which permits arbitrary finite enclosing polygons, with its origin-centered quadrilateral restriction W. For each fixed real t and all sufficiently small positive ε, exact equality V = W holds when t < √2−1 or t ≥ √2/3. For √2−1 < t < √2/3, the gap is W(Lε,t) − V(Lε,t) = (1−t)(t−√2+1)ε2/(4√2) + O(ε3) > 0. At t = √2−1, the first nonzero term is instead (23√2−32)ε3/16, with remainder O(ε4). A moving-facet gauge plateau controls arbitrary nearby enclosures; exact product monotonicity centers the competing orientation. Matching feasible polygons yield scalar envelopes of the actual indices. This provisional candidate classification is conditional on the previously obtained minimum, genuine-pentagon bound and complete equality classification for the limiting affine-regular hexagon. No effective parameter cutoff, uniform classification across the transitions or classification of all optimizing polygons is claimed.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Point processes and geometric inequalities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon