Molecular bacterial detection in nasopharyngeal swabs does not predict the clinical course of lower respiratory tract infections in primary care: an ancillary study of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care molecular tests on easily collected samples could support antimicrobial stewardship in primary care. AIM: To determine whether molecular bacterial detection in nasopharyngeal swabs is associated with a worse disease course in patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial including 469 consecutive patients with LRTI, from 60 primary care practices in Switzerland. METHODS: Polymerase chain reaction assays for respiratory viruses and bacteria were retrospectively performed on nasopharyngeal swabs. Kaplan-Meier analyses and a multivariate Cox regression were used to evaluate time to recovery according to bacterial detection. RESULTS: A total of 345 patients were included, of which 142 (41%) had bacteria detected. The detection of bacteria did not influence median time to recovery (7 days in both groups, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6-8 days, p=0.29). Bacterial detection was not associated with time to recovery (adjusted hazard ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.84-1.50, p=0.42), nor was the interaction term between bacterial detection and antibiotic prescription (adjusted hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.64-1.90, p=0.74), indicating independence from antibiotic treatment. The detection of bacteria was not associated with a different median duration of cough, sputum, or dyspnoea. The median duration of cough of any severity was 16 days (95% CI 15-18 days). CONCLUSION: Among patients with LRTI in primary care, molecular detection of bacteria in nasopharyngeal swabs did not predict a worse disease course. These findings cast doubts on the utility of syndromic molecular testing for managing LRTIs in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2026.0056
Primary Topic
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Molecular bacterial detection in nasopharyngeal swabs does not predict the clinical course of lower respiratory tract infections in primary care: an ancillary study of a randomized controlled trial

Andreas Kronenberg, Yolanda Kathrin Mueller, Marie-Anne Page, Loïc Lhopitallier et al.
British Journal of General Practice
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
article

Molecular bacterial detection in nasopharyngeal swabs does not predict the clinical course of lower respiratory tract infections in primary care: an ancillary study of a randomized controlled trial

Andreas Kronenberg, Yolanda Kathrin Mueller, Marie-Anne Page, Loïc Lhopitallier, José Knüsli, Valérie D’Acremont, Isabella Locatelli, Onya Opota, Noémie Boillat‐Blanco, Aline Mamin, Nicolas Senn, Marc-Antoine Perrenoud
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care molecular tests on easily collected samples could support antimicrobial stewardship in primary care. AIM: To determine whether molecular bacterial detection in nasopharyngeal swabs is associated with a worse disease course in patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial including 469 consecutive patients with LRTI, from 60 primary care practices in Switzerland. METHODS: Polymerase chain reaction assays for respiratory viruses and bacteria were retrospectively performed on nasopharyngeal swabs. Kaplan-Meier analyses and a multivariate Cox regression were used to evaluate time to recovery according to bacterial detection. RESULTS: A total of 345 patients were included, of which 142 (41%) had bacteria detected. The detection of bacteria did not influence median time to recovery (7 days in both groups, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6-8 days, p=0.29). Bacterial detection was not associated with time to recovery (adjusted hazard ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.84-1.50, p=0.42), nor was the interaction term between bacterial detection and antibiotic prescription (adjusted hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.64-1.90, p=0.74), indicating independence from antibiotic treatment. The detection of bacteria was not associated with a different median duration of cough, sputum, or dyspnoea. The median duration of cough of any severity was 16 days (95% CI 15-18 days). CONCLUSION: Among patients with LRTI in primary care, molecular detection of bacteria in nasopharyngeal swabs did not predict a worse disease course. These findings cast doubts on the utility of syndromic molecular testing for managing LRTIs in this setting.

British Journal of General Practice
University of Bern (CH), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon