The Kosovo analogy in Putin’s foreign policy discourse

Historical analogies can inform policy debate and justify action, but public references alone cannot establish learning. This article examines how Vladimir Putin invoked Kosovo in official discourse between 2000 and 2023. A longitudinal qualitative analysis of 24 executive records distinguishes the analogy’s source referent, target, public timing and argumentative function. The records show overlapping uses. Hereby, there are diagnosis of an unequal security order, warnings about future recognition and justification of actions in Georgia and Ukraine. Prospective comparisons appear by December 2004 while retrospective justification is explicit in August 2008. Later invocations selectively connect NATO’s intervention, Kosovo’s independence and the International Court of Justice’s opinion to different Russian claims. This study delineates how an analogy can transition from serving as a warning to a justification, all while the creator refrains from supporting a consistent secessionist doctrine. Status and identity scholarship helps interpret the accompanying claims to equality and agency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2026.2754547
Primary Topic
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Kosovo analogy in Putin’s foreign policy discourse

Mehmet Çağatay Güler
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
article

The Kosovo analogy in Putin’s foreign policy discourse

Mehmet Çağatay Güler
article en

Abstract

Historical analogies can inform policy debate and justify action, but public references alone cannot establish learning. This article examines how Vladimir Putin invoked Kosovo in official discourse between 2000 and 2023. A longitudinal qualitative analysis of 24 executive records distinguishes the analogy’s source referent, target, public timing and argumentative function. The records show overlapping uses. Hereby, there are diagnosis of an unequal security order, warnings about future recognition and justification of actions in Georgia and Ukraine. Prospective comparisons appear by December 2004 while retrospective justification is explicit in August 2008. Later invocations selectively connect NATO’s intervention, Kosovo’s independence and the International Court of Justice’s opinion to different Russian claims. This study delineates how an analogy can transition from serving as a warning to a justification, all while the creator refrains from supporting a consistent secessionist doctrine. Status and identity scholarship helps interpret the accompanying claims to equality and agency.

Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Bilkent University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon