Bringing developmental science closer to families: Caregivers’ and professionals’ perspectives on participation in early childhood research

Developmental research has historically underrepresented families experiencing psychosocial adversity, partly due to barriers posed by in-person laboratory paradigms. Online, webcam-based methods may support more inclusive research, but their design must be informed by the communities they seek to include.Four focus groups were conducted with caregivers of young children (n = 10) and professionals from child protection, health, and education settings (n = 12), exploring barriers and facilitators to participation, and attitudes toward online data collection. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, with participant resonance checks.Families expressed concerns about privacy and the use of children’s images, while professionals described hypervigilance towards authority among multi-challenged families. Developmental feedback and resources were valued over financial incentives, and online participation was viewed favourably, conditional on material and researcher support. Inclusive developmental science requires moving closer to families’ spaces and priorities, for instance by running studies in places families already use.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fyuqp_v1
Primary Topic
Children's Rights and Participation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Bringing developmental science closer to families: Caregivers’ and professionals’ perspectives on participation in early childhood research

Adriana Sampaio, Isabel Soares, Eugénia Ribeiro, Ana Maria Portugal et al.
1 links
Children's Rights and Participation
preprint

Bringing developmental science closer to families: Caregivers’ and professionals’ perspectives on participation in early childhood research

Adriana Sampaio, Isabel Soares, Eugénia Ribeiro, Ana Maria Portugal, Marlene Sousa
preprint en

Abstract

Developmental research has historically underrepresented families experiencing psychosocial adversity, partly due to barriers posed by in-person laboratory paradigms. Online, webcam-based methods may support more inclusive research, but their design must be informed by the communities they seek to include.Four focus groups were conducted with caregivers of young children (n = 10) and professionals from child protection, health, and education settings (n = 12), exploring barriers and facilitators to participation, and attitudes toward online data collection. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, with participant resonance checks.Families expressed concerns about privacy and the use of children’s images, while professionals described hypervigilance towards authority among multi-challenged families. Developmental feedback and resources were valued over financial incentives, and online participation was viewed favourably, conditional on material and researcher support. Inclusive developmental science requires moving closer to families’ spaces and priorities, for instance by running studies in places families already use.

Reduced inequalities, Gender equality
Children's Rights and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon