SOCRATIVE-BASED DIGITAL FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT WITH IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK AND LEARNING ENGAGEMENT AMONG B.ED. STUDENTS: A MIXED-METHOD STUDY

Digital formative assessment provides opportunities for teachers to obtain information about students' learning during instruction and to respond with timely feedback. This mixed-method classroom study examined changes in learning-engagement and feedback-related perceptions and formative-assessment knowledge among B.Ed. students following the use of Socrative-based digital formative assessment with immediate feedback. The study employed a one-group pretest-posttest design involving 46 B.Ed. students enrolled in an Assessment for Learning course. Two Socrative-based assessment sessions were conducted during the intervention period. Each session contained 10 questions, and approximately 15 minutes were provided for completion. Students accessed the activities using mobile phones. Socrative supplied immediate information about correct and incorrect responses, after which the teacher provided explanations and clarification of misconceptions. Quantitative data were collected through pretest and posttest responses while Qualitative data was obtained from open-ended responses and classroom observations. The Likert scale consists of eight items showed high internal consistency at both administrations (pretest α = .924; posttest α = .933). Among the 45 students who completed both test. Learning-engagement and feedback-related scores increased from M = 32.73 (SD = 6.36) at pretest to M = 33.54 (SD = 5.90) at posttest. However, this difference was not statistically significant, t (44) = 0.91, p = .367, d = .14. Formative-assessment knowledge scores also showed a small increase, from M = 2.30 (SD = 0.96) to M = 2.46 (SD = 0.98), with no statistically significant difference, t (45) = −0.87, p = .391, d = .13. Qualitative findings shows that students were perceived feedback was very useful for identifying their strengths and weaknesses, understanding mistakes and planning for further steps and strategies to improve their learning. Classroom observations further indicated that the learner has interest in the digital formative assessment format and appreciated the information about whether their response is correct or incorrect. The results reveal that Socrative was feasible for conducting formative assessment in the classroom. The short period of intervention, absence of a comparison group, one-institution sample, and limited platform data makes it difficult to interpret data normally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interdisciplinary Perspectives of Education
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65525/ipe.v3i2.128
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SOCRATIVE-BASED DIGITAL FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT WITH IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK AND LEARNING ENGAGEMENT AMONG B.ED. STUDENTS: A MIXED-METHOD STUDY

Prof. (Dr.) K. Venkatramanan, Mrs. J. Jayapriya
1 links
Interdisciplinary Perspectives of Education
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

SOCRATIVE-BASED DIGITAL FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT WITH IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK AND LEARNING ENGAGEMENT AMONG B.ED. STUDENTS: A MIXED-METHOD STUDY

Prof. (Dr.) K. Venkatramanan, Mrs. J. Jayapriya
article en

Abstract

Digital formative assessment provides opportunities for teachers to obtain information about students' learning during instruction and to respond with timely feedback. This mixed-method classroom study examined changes in learning-engagement and feedback-related perceptions and formative-assessment knowledge among B.Ed. students following the use of Socrative-based digital formative assessment with immediate feedback. The study employed a one-group pretest-posttest design involving 46 B.Ed. students enrolled in an Assessment for Learning course. Two Socrative-based assessment sessions were conducted during the intervention period. Each session contained 10 questions, and approximately 15 minutes were provided for completion. Students accessed the activities using mobile phones. Socrative supplied immediate information about correct and incorrect responses, after which the teacher provided explanations and clarification of misconceptions. Quantitative data were collected through pretest and posttest responses while Qualitative data was obtained from open-ended responses and classroom observations. The Likert scale consists of eight items showed high internal consistency at both administrations (pretest α = .924; posttest α = .933). Among the 45 students who completed both test. Learning-engagement and feedback-related scores increased from M = 32.73 (SD = 6.36) at pretest to M = 33.54 (SD = 5.90) at posttest. However, this difference was not statistically significant, t (44) = 0.91, p = .367, d = .14. Formative-assessment knowledge scores also showed a small increase, from M = 2.30 (SD = 0.96) to M = 2.46 (SD = 0.98), with no statistically significant difference, t (45) = −0.87, p = .391, d = .13. Qualitative findings shows that students were perceived feedback was very useful for identifying their strengths and weaknesses, understanding mistakes and planning for further steps and strategies to improve their learning. Classroom observations further indicated that the learner has interest in the digital formative assessment format and appreciated the information about whether their response is correct or incorrect. The results reveal that Socrative was feasible for conducting formative assessment in the classroom. The short period of intervention, absence of a comparison group, one-institution sample, and limited platform data makes it difficult to interpret data normally.

Interdisciplinary Perspectives of EducationVol. 3(2)
Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya (IN)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon