Evaluating Skills Formation: Reflections From a Multi-Country Study

This article reflects on methodological insights from a study that combined research and evaluation to examine vocational skills development in six low- and middle-income countries. The study sought to understand the role of vocational skills development in driving industrial transformation, growth, and inclusivity but encountered key challenges in defining what was being evaluated, mapping causal pathways, and managing data limitations. One difficulty was whether the evaluation assessed individual programmes, broader policies and strategies, or the entire skills formation ecosystem. The mixed-methods approach allowed for triangulation but the absence of a sharp enough focus, complicated data analysis. Limited opportunities for reflection between research phases – due to funding uncertainties and tight deadlines – constrained iterative learning. Practical challenges also arose: historical records were inconsistent, and data collection was complicated by the fact that training managers were rarely the same individuals responsible for work organisation, technology adoption, or company strategy. Despite these constraints, the study underscored the value of an approach that integrates research and evaluation and was able to achieve results that meaningfully contribute to the knowledge about the ways in which vocational skills development supports workplace transformation, inclusivity and growth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x261502947
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Skills Formation: Reflections From a Multi-Country Study

Michael Morlok, Carmel Linda Marock
1 links
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Evaluating Skills Formation: Reflections From a Multi-Country Study

Michael Morlok, Carmel Linda Marock
article en

Abstract

This article reflects on methodological insights from a study that combined research and evaluation to examine vocational skills development in six low- and middle-income countries. The study sought to understand the role of vocational skills development in driving industrial transformation, growth, and inclusivity but encountered key challenges in defining what was being evaluated, mapping causal pathways, and managing data limitations. One difficulty was whether the evaluation assessed individual programmes, broader policies and strategies, or the entire skills formation ecosystem. The mixed-methods approach allowed for triangulation but the absence of a sharp enough focus, complicated data analysis. Limited opportunities for reflection between research phases – due to funding uncertainties and tight deadlines – constrained iterative learning. Practical challenges also arose: historical records were inconsistent, and data collection was complicated by the fact that training managers were rarely the same individuals responsible for work organisation, technology adoption, or company strategy. Despite these constraints, the study underscored the value of an approach that integrates research and evaluation and was able to achieve results that meaningfully contribute to the knowledge about the ways in which vocational skills development supports workplace transformation, inclusivity and growth.

Evaluation Journal of Australasia
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit
Decent work and economic growth, Quality education, Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon