First-hour infection recognition and 24-hour sepsis classification in emergency resuscitation-room encounters: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background During the first hour of emergency resuscitation, clinicians must decide whether critical illness is infectious and whether an infected patient has, or develops, infection-associated organ dysfunction. The first decision may be difficult in older or severely ill patients with atypical presentations; the second determines the urgency of monitoring and resuscitation. We assessed how first-hour information supported these linked clinical questions. Methods This single-centre retrospective cohort included 1,195 non-consecutive adult resuscitation-room encounters: 240 non-infectious critical illnesses, 218 infections without sepsis and 737 cases of sepsis. We compared age, sex and vital signs; their combination with complete blood-count indices; and the further addition of lactate and procalcitonin. Analyses developed in 2023–2024 were applied without refitting to a post hoc 2025 sample. Question 1 distinguished final physician-adjudicated infection from non-infectious illness; Question 2 classified 24-hour Sepsis-3 status among adjudicated infections. Results In the 2025 sample, 139 of 174 encounters involved infection. Vital signs and complete blood-count indices distinguished infection from non-infectious illness with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.808 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.733–0.877). Adding lactate and procalcitonin increased the AUROC to 0.868 (0.813–0.921; change, 0.060 [0.029–0.097]). At a high-sensitivity threshold, 127 of 139 infections were identified and 23 of 35 non-infectious encounters were also flagged. Among 139 infected encounters, 110 met the 24-hour sepsis definition. Clinical and complete blood-count information identified 103 cases and showed moderate discrimination (AUROC, 0.780 [0.682–0.865]). Adding lactate and procalcitonin did not improve discrimination (AUROC, 0.766 [0.665–0.856]; change, − 0.014 [− 0.090 to 0.060]). Conclusions In this selected emergency-resuscitation cohort, first-hour vital signs and complete blood-count indices discriminated final infection classification from non-infectious critical illness, and lactate plus procalcitonin improved that discrimination. Among infected patients, first-hour clinical and complete blood-count information also discriminated 24-hour sepsis status, but lactate and procalcitonin added no clear value. These findings support structured early assessment and reassessment; they do not establish a stand-alone treatment rule.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11073702/v1
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

First-hour infection recognition and 24-hour sepsis classification in emergency resuscitation-room encounters: a retrospective cohort study

Shunhua Ye, Fengqing Song, Huiling Lan, Pengfei Wang et al.
1 links
Research Square
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
preprint

First-hour infection recognition and 24-hour sepsis classification in emergency resuscitation-room encounters: a retrospective cohort study

Shunhua Ye, Fengqing Song, Huiling Lan, Pengfei Wang, Xin Wang, Tao Yu, Li Li, Peng Wang
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background During the first hour of emergency resuscitation, clinicians must decide whether critical illness is infectious and whether an infected patient has, or develops, infection-associated organ dysfunction. The first decision may be difficult in older or severely ill patients with atypical presentations; the second determines the urgency of monitoring and resuscitation. We assessed how first-hour information supported these linked clinical questions. Methods This single-centre retrospective cohort included 1,195 non-consecutive adult resuscitation-room encounters: 240 non-infectious critical illnesses, 218 infections without sepsis and 737 cases of sepsis. We compared age, sex and vital signs; their combination with complete blood-count indices; and the further addition of lactate and procalcitonin. Analyses developed in 2023–2024 were applied without refitting to a post hoc 2025 sample. Question 1 distinguished final physician-adjudicated infection from non-infectious illness; Question 2 classified 24-hour Sepsis-3 status among adjudicated infections. Results In the 2025 sample, 139 of 174 encounters involved infection. Vital signs and complete blood-count indices distinguished infection from non-infectious illness with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.808 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.733–0.877). Adding lactate and procalcitonin increased the AUROC to 0.868 (0.813–0.921; change, 0.060 [0.029–0.097]). At a high-sensitivity threshold, 127 of 139 infections were identified and 23 of 35 non-infectious encounters were also flagged. Among 139 infected encounters, 110 met the 24-hour sepsis definition. Clinical and complete blood-count information identified 103 cases and showed moderate discrimination (AUROC, 0.780 [0.682–0.865]). Adding lactate and procalcitonin did not improve discrimination (AUROC, 0.766 [0.665–0.856]; change, − 0.014 [− 0.090 to 0.060]). Conclusions In this selected emergency-resuscitation cohort, first-hour vital signs and complete blood-count indices discriminated final infection classification from non-infectious critical illness, and lactate plus procalcitonin improved that discrimination. Among infected patients, first-hour clinical and complete blood-count information also discriminated 24-hour sepsis status, but lactate and procalcitonin added no clear value. These findings support structured early assessment and reassessment; they do not establish a stand-alone treatment rule.

Research Square
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon