The use of a non-invasive neuromonitoring device in the emergency department: comparison with computed tomography results

Computed tomography (CT) is widely used to evaluate emergency department (ED) patients with headache, increasing costs, radiation exposure, and workload. Non-invasive intracranial pressure waveform (ICPW) monitoring has been proposed as an adjunctive triage tool. We assessed its diagnostic performance for identifying abnormal head CT findings in ED patients with red-flag headaches and explored potential resource implications. This retrospective study included 84 patients with red-flag headaches at Hospital Leforte Morumbi, Brazil (June-September 2023). All underwent non-invasive ICPW monitoring (brain4care System) and head CT during the same ED encounter. ICPW was abnormal if P2/P1 ≥ 1.2 or time-to-peak (TTP) ≥ 0.3. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated against abnormal CT. CT expenditure and ED length of stay were assessed as exploratory outcomes. ICPW showed 90.0% sensitivity, 66.2% specificity, 98.0% NPV, and 26.5% PPV for abnormal CT. Median P2/P1 ratio yielded an ROC AUC of 0.778 (95% CI 0.640-0.900). Forty-nine patients (58.3%) had both normal ICPW and normal CT; their median ED stay was 3.5 h shorter than that of the overall cohort, though causality cannot be inferred. One patient had normal ICPW despite abnormal CT. Hypothetically, the normal examinations represented a projected gross CT expenditure of US$34,300. The high NPV supports further investigation of ICPW as an adjunctive risk-stratification tool, but the retrospective single-center design, small sample, and few abnormal CTs preclude definitive conclusions. ICPW should not replace clinical assessment or neuroimaging; resource implications remain exploratory hypotheses requiring prospective, multicenter validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01499-9
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The use of a non-invasive neuromonitoring device in the emergency department: comparison with computed tomography results

Wander L. Valentim, José Eduardo Tambor Bueno, Victor Gadelha, Ana Carolina Giorgi Martin et al.
2 links
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
article

The use of a non-invasive neuromonitoring device in the emergency department: comparison with computed tomography results

Wander L. Valentim, José Eduardo Tambor Bueno, Victor Gadelha, Ana Carolina Giorgi Martin, Hassan Ahmed Yassine Neto
article en

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is widely used to evaluate emergency department (ED) patients with headache, increasing costs, radiation exposure, and workload. Non-invasive intracranial pressure waveform (ICPW) monitoring has been proposed as an adjunctive triage tool. We assessed its diagnostic performance for identifying abnormal head CT findings in ED patients with red-flag headaches and explored potential resource implications. This retrospective study included 84 patients with red-flag headaches at Hospital Leforte Morumbi, Brazil (June-September 2023). All underwent non-invasive ICPW monitoring (brain4care System) and head CT during the same ED encounter. ICPW was abnormal if P2/P1 ≥ 1.2 or time-to-peak (TTP) ≥ 0.3. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated against abnormal CT. CT expenditure and ED length of stay were assessed as exploratory outcomes. ICPW showed 90.0% sensitivity, 66.2% specificity, 98.0% NPV, and 26.5% PPV for abnormal CT. Median P2/P1 ratio yielded an ROC AUC of 0.778 (95% CI 0.640-0.900). Forty-nine patients (58.3%) had both normal ICPW and normal CT; their median ED stay was 3.5 h shorter than that of the overall cohort, though causality cannot be inferred. One patient had normal ICPW despite abnormal CT. Hypothetically, the normal examinations represented a projected gross CT expenditure of US$34,300. The high NPV supports further investigation of ICPW as an adjunctive risk-stratification tool, but the retrospective single-center design, small sample, and few abnormal CTs preclude definitive conclusions. ICPW should not replace clinical assessment or neuroimaging; resource implications remain exploratory hypotheses requiring prospective, multicenter validation.

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Hospital Leforte (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon