From authority to everyday realities: a research note on epistemic justice in research with divorcing individuals

While divorce is becoming increasingly common worldwide, discussion of research methods that enhance engagement with divorced and divorcing individuals remains scarce. Guided by values of cultural humility and social justice, we sought to centre the research participants’ perspectives in both research methods and outcomes. It is an attempt to move away from extractive research practices in data collection. We found that Shamsul’s concept of ‘authority-defined’ and every-defined” realities, together with the team’s collective synergy, provided valuable guidance in shaping and contextualising the initiative. Yet, while the pursuit of social justice lies at the heart of research, it concurrently created a dilemma for the researchers to navigate ethical values and practical demands of research. This research note aims to disseminate the research reflection and methods while engaging with divorcing individuals in research. It outlines the study’s background, the values that underpinned the research, the data-collection methods, and reflection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2026.2756916
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From authority to everyday realities: a research note on epistemic justice in research with divorcing individuals

Serena In, Gaik Kin Teoh, Joo Siang Tan, Pei Kuan Lai et al.
1 links
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

From authority to everyday realities: a research note on epistemic justice in research with divorcing individuals

Serena In, Gaik Kin Teoh, Joo Siang Tan, Pei Kuan Lai, Zilal Saari, Juliet Mathew, Kenny Wei Yi Chin, Rui Wen Tien
article en

Abstract

While divorce is becoming increasingly common worldwide, discussion of research methods that enhance engagement with divorced and divorcing individuals remains scarce. Guided by values of cultural humility and social justice, we sought to centre the research participants’ perspectives in both research methods and outcomes. It is an attempt to move away from extractive research practices in data collection. We found that Shamsul’s concept of ‘authority-defined’ and every-defined” realities, together with the team’s collective synergy, provided valuable guidance in shaping and contextualising the initiative. Yet, while the pursuit of social justice lies at the heart of research, it concurrently created a dilemma for the researchers to navigate ethical values and practical demands of research. This research note aims to disseminate the research reflection and methods while engaging with divorcing individuals in research. It outlines the study’s background, the values that underpinned the research, the data-collection methods, and reflection.

International Journal of Social Research Methodology
University of Technology Malaysia (MY), IMU University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon