From authority to everyday realities: a research note on epistemic justice in research with divorcing individuals
While divorce is becoming increasingly common worldwide, discussion of research methods that enhance engagement with divorced and divorcing individuals remains scarce. Guided by values of cultural humility and social justice, we sought to centre the research participants’ perspectives in both research methods and outcomes. It is an attempt to move away from extractive research practices in data collection. We found that Shamsul’s concept of ‘authority-defined’ and every-defined” realities, together with the team’s collective synergy, provided valuable guidance in shaping and contextualising the initiative. Yet, while the pursuit of social justice lies at the heart of research, it concurrently created a dilemma for the researchers to navigate ethical values and practical demands of research. This research note aims to disseminate the research reflection and methods while engaging with divorcing individuals in research. It outlines the study’s background, the values that underpinned the research, the data-collection methods, and reflection.
Authors
- Serena In (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8818-2053)
- Gaik Kin Teoh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-3548)
- Joo Siang Tan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6677-375X)
- Pei Kuan Lai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7227-3257)
- Zilal Saari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4254-4327)
- Juliet Mathew (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1667-5413)
- Kenny Wei Yi Chin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5475-2712)
- Rui Wen Tien (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3136-5669)
Institutions
- University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
- IMU University (MY)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Social Research Methodology
- Published
- 2026-11-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2026.2756916
- Primary Topic
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00