Evidence of widespread sequencing errors in global avian influenza study

Wannigama et al. (2025) 1 present a study whereby guano samples from infrequently sampled countries were assessed for the presence of avian influenza viruses. Samples were collected from Africa (Madagascar, Mozambique, Somalia), the Middle East (Yemen), South Asia (Maldives, Sri Lanka), South East Asia (Indonesia, Myanmar, the Philippines) and Oceania (Papua New Guinea). The study aims to address critical gaps in global surveillance and provide important data that could enhance understanding of regional viral diversity and evolution, as well as inform high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) incursion risk assessments. However, the data presented and the conclusions drawn from this study are of high concern to the global influenza community. The viral sequence data on which the study is based contradict long-established understanding of global avian influenza evolution, resulting in conclusions that are incongruent with the global evidence base. The publication of erroneous viral sequences in public databases such as GenBank or GISAID hinders rational interpretation of data in a global context, resulting in misleading conclusions that affect disease risk assessments and policy decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78539-0
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence of widespread sequencing errors in global avian influenza study

Michelle Wille, Ashley C. Banyard, Martha I. Nelson, Nicola S. Lewis et al.
3 links
Nature Communications
Influenza Virus Research Studies
article

Evidence of widespread sequencing errors in global avian influenza study

Michelle Wille, Ashley C. Banyard, Martha I. Nelson, Nicola S. Lewis, Alice Fusaro, Erik A. Karlsson, Frank Y. K. Wong, Marcela Uhart, Ian Hay Brown, Andrew C. Breed, Francesco Bonfante, David E. Swayne, Leslie D. Sims
article en

Abstract

Wannigama et al. (2025) 1 present a study whereby guano samples from infrequently sampled countries were assessed for the presence of avian influenza viruses. Samples were collected from Africa (Madagascar, Mozambique, Somalia), the Middle East (Yemen), South Asia (Maldives, Sri Lanka), South East Asia (Indonesia, Myanmar, the Philippines) and Oceania (Papua New Guinea). The study aims to address critical gaps in global surveillance and provide important data that could enhance understanding of regional viral diversity and evolution, as well as inform high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) incursion risk assessments. However, the data presented and the conclusions drawn from this study are of high concern to the global influenza community. The viral sequence data on which the study is based contradict long-established understanding of global avian influenza evolution, resulting in conclusions that are incongruent with the global evidence base. The publication of erroneous viral sequences in public databases such as GenBank or GISAID hinders rational interpretation of data in a global context, resulting in misleading conclusions that affect disease risk assessments and policy decisions.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
University of London (GB), The Pirbright Institute (GB), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), National Institutes of Health (US), Royal Veterinary College (GB), Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Georgia (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Animal and Plant Health Agency (GB), United States National Library of Medicine (US), The Francis Crick Institute (GB), Peter Doherty Institute (AU), Institut Pasteur du Cambodge (KH), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IT), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon