NEEDS-BASED ETHICS (Version III | Part I — Foundations)

Abstract Needs-Based Ethics (NBE) is proposed as an ethical framework with civic applications for examining human needs, harm, power and responsibility under conditions of moral and cultural plurality. It seeks to identify ethically significant concerns without requiring agreement upon a comprehensive conception of the good life, while distinguishing genuine needs from the preferences, expressions and satisfiers through which people pursue legitimate ways of living. Part I develops the framework’s conceptual and normative foundations through engagement with established theories of human needs, capabilities, autonomy, care, harm and power. It presents an analytical grammar, a nine-stage process for ethical action, a three-layer harm taxonomy comprising twenty-four contextual and experiential categories, eleven domains and eleven assessment dimensions, and an account of nine modes of power and differentiated responsibility. Central distinctions separate the recognition of harm from causal explanation and the allocation of responsibility, while distinguishing ethical need from practical feasibility, legitimate strategy and the transformation of constraints. NBE’s ten ethical Charter principles articulate constraints upon ethical inquiry and action, including the framework’s own potential exercise of authority, with implications for civic coexistence. The framework also recognises the moral significance of sentient animals and ecological communities, while acknowledging unresolved questions concerning competing claims. NBE is presented as an integrative and contestable research programme, not a validated decision procedure or substitute for rights, legitimate institutions or personal autonomy. Subsequent Parts will address epistemology, legitimate conflict and routing, and responsible institutional and AI-supported implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23881303
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NEEDS-BASED ETHICS (Version III | Part I — Foundations)

David William Roberts
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

NEEDS-BASED ETHICS (Version III | Part I — Foundations)

David William Roberts
article en

Abstract

Abstract Needs-Based Ethics (NBE) is proposed as an ethical framework with civic applications for examining human needs, harm, power and responsibility under conditions of moral and cultural plurality. It seeks to identify ethically significant concerns without requiring agreement upon a comprehensive conception of the good life, while distinguishing genuine needs from the preferences, expressions and satisfiers through which people pursue legitimate ways of living. Part I develops the framework’s conceptual and normative foundations through engagement with established theories of human needs, capabilities, autonomy, care, harm and power. It presents an analytical grammar, a nine-stage process for ethical action, a three-layer harm taxonomy comprising twenty-four contextual and experiential categories, eleven domains and eleven assessment dimensions, and an account of nine modes of power and differentiated responsibility. Central distinctions separate the recognition of harm from causal explanation and the allocation of responsibility, while distinguishing ethical need from practical feasibility, legitimate strategy and the transformation of constraints. NBE’s ten ethical Charter principles articulate constraints upon ethical inquiry and action, including the framework’s own potential exercise of authority, with implications for civic coexistence. The framework also recognises the moral significance of sentient animals and ecological communities, while acknowledging unresolved questions concerning competing claims. NBE is presented as an integrative and contestable research programme, not a validated decision procedure or substitute for rights, legitimate institutions or personal autonomy. Subsequent Parts will address epistemology, legitimate conflict and routing, and responsible institutional and AI-supported implementation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon