Conscious entrapment: how institutional modalities produce response–resolution decoupling on a Chinese online governance platform

Purpose This study aims to examine how institutional modalities produce and sustain the response–resolution decoupling on a Chinese online governance platform, addressing the gap between quantitative findings on what correlates with responsiveness and qualitative understanding of how it operates. Design/methodology/approach This paper involves a qualitative single case study combining document analysis with semi-structured interviews with practitioners involved in platform-based responsiveness, analyzed through structuration theory’s three modalities (signification, domination and legitimation) and their recursive interplay. Findings Three modalities jointly produce response–resolution decoupling (RQ1). Interpretive schemes construct demands through power-laden priority logics. Through power relations, scarce resources are channeled toward response production. Normative justifications, meanwhile, reward procedural compliance over resolution. Their recursive interaction reproduces the decoupling (RQ2), an unintentional structural emergence where actors recognize the gap yet cannot escape it (“conscious entrapment”). Case-grounded conjectures derived from the analysis are offered for further testing. Practical implications Partial reform risks are absorbed by the unreformed dimensions of the system. Breaking the recursive cycle requires action across all three modalities simultaneously. Social implications By showing that rapid, visible replies can coexist with unresolved problems, the study helps citizens and oversight institutions read platform performance more critically: what platforms count as responsiveness is not what citizens experience as resolution. Originality/value This study specifies “conscious entrapment” as a subtype of institutional decoupling, identifies tri-modal closure as the mechanism producing response–resolution decoupling and demonstrates that the decoupling is sustained by recursive interaction among the three modalities rather than by one-time policy failures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transforming Government People Process and Policy
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-06-2026-0327
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conscious entrapment: how institutional modalities produce response–resolution decoupling on a Chinese online governance platform

Zhengrong Wang
4 links
Transforming Government People Process and Policy
E-Government and Public Services
article

Conscious entrapment: how institutional modalities produce response–resolution decoupling on a Chinese online governance platform

Zhengrong Wang
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how institutional modalities produce and sustain the response–resolution decoupling on a Chinese online governance platform, addressing the gap between quantitative findings on what correlates with responsiveness and qualitative understanding of how it operates. Design/methodology/approach This paper involves a qualitative single case study combining document analysis with semi-structured interviews with practitioners involved in platform-based responsiveness, analyzed through structuration theory’s three modalities (signification, domination and legitimation) and their recursive interplay. Findings Three modalities jointly produce response–resolution decoupling (RQ1). Interpretive schemes construct demands through power-laden priority logics. Through power relations, scarce resources are channeled toward response production. Normative justifications, meanwhile, reward procedural compliance over resolution. Their recursive interaction reproduces the decoupling (RQ2), an unintentional structural emergence where actors recognize the gap yet cannot escape it (“conscious entrapment”). Case-grounded conjectures derived from the analysis are offered for further testing. Practical implications Partial reform risks are absorbed by the unreformed dimensions of the system. Breaking the recursive cycle requires action across all three modalities simultaneously. Social implications By showing that rapid, visible replies can coexist with unresolved problems, the study helps citizens and oversight institutions read platform performance more critically: what platforms count as responsiveness is not what citizens experience as resolution. Originality/value This study specifies “conscious entrapment” as a subtype of institutional decoupling, identifies tri-modal closure as the mechanism producing response–resolution decoupling and demonstrates that the decoupling is sustained by recursive interaction among the three modalities rather than by one-time policy failures.

Transforming Government People Process and Policy
Guangdong Vocational Institute Of Public Administration (CN)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon