Modeling exhaled aerosol deposition in an impaction filter across clinically measured breath flowrates

Exhaled breath offers a non-invasive matrix for detecting recent drug use, but high intra and inter-study variability in collected drug mass currently hinders its transition into reliable quantitative clinical and forensic tools. To enable standardized, reproducible sampling protocols, we evaluated flowrate-dependent aerosol capture in an impaction filter device (Breath Explor). We expanded a computational fluid and particle dynamics (CFPD) model across a flowrate spectrum informed by clinical data from 38 participants (N=12,295 exhalations; mean flowrate 0.15 ± 0.04 L · s-1). We also enhanced the near-wall transport model to resolve turbulent aerosol dispersion at high resolution. CFPD simulations showed that turbulent forces account for up to 20% of mass deposition for submicrometer-size aerosols within this operational range. Crucially, capture efficiency varied more than two-fold-ranging from 42% at 0.05 L·s-1 to 90% at 0.3 L·s-1-at a constant exhaled volume. These findings demonstrate that breath flowrate directly impacts aerosol recovery, suggesting that participant flowrate guidance or mathematical recovery normalization could improve the reproducibility of drug quantification. Ultimately, this work demonstrates how combining real-world clinical data with CFPD modeling can inform standardized, quantitative breath diagnostics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Breath Research
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/aebca8
Primary Topic
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling exhaled aerosol deposition in an impaction filter across clinically measured breath flowrates

Kavita M. Jeerage, Veruska Malavé, Austin C. Hayes, Jennifer L. Berry et al.
Journal of Breath Research
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
article

Modeling exhaled aerosol deposition in an impaction filter across clinically measured breath flowrates

Kavita M. Jeerage, Veruska Malavé, Austin C. Hayes, Jennifer L. Berry, L. Cinnamon Bidwell, Tara M. Lovestead
article en

Abstract

Exhaled breath offers a non-invasive matrix for detecting recent drug use, but high intra and inter-study variability in collected drug mass currently hinders its transition into reliable quantitative clinical and forensic tools. To enable standardized, reproducible sampling protocols, we evaluated flowrate-dependent aerosol capture in an impaction filter device (Breath Explor). We expanded a computational fluid and particle dynamics (CFPD) model across a flowrate spectrum informed by clinical data from 38 participants (N=12,295 exhalations; mean flowrate 0.15 ± 0.04 L · s-1). We also enhanced the near-wall transport model to resolve turbulent aerosol dispersion at high resolution. CFPD simulations showed that turbulent forces account for up to 20% of mass deposition for submicrometer-size aerosols within this operational range. Crucially, capture efficiency varied more than two-fold-ranging from 42% at 0.05 L·s-1 to 90% at 0.3 L·s-1-at a constant exhaled volume. These findings demonstrate that breath flowrate directly impacts aerosol recovery, suggesting that participant flowrate guidance or mathematical recovery normalization could improve the reproducibility of drug quantification. Ultimately, this work demonstrates how combining real-world clinical data with CFPD modeling can inform standardized, quantitative breath diagnostics.

Journal of Breath Research
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US)
National Institute of Standards and Technology, National Institute of Justice
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon