显隐而非有无 ——本源问题的一条结构化进路

Abstract Two formulations dominate the question of the origin (benyuan): asking what the origin is, and asking whence things come. Both presuppose that the origin is an item, and can therefore stand in a relation to whatever is other than itself. Three costs follow. Uniqueness can only be asserted, never derived, since the rule that would adjudicate between two candidate origins itself requires a higher rule. Every causal link between origin and manifestation requires a medium, and mediating the medium generates a regress; internalizing the medium removes the regress but maximizes necessity, leaving no place for the unmanifest. And once the origin is placed beyond speech, statements about it lose their criterion of assessment. The paper proposes a different question: not what the origin is, but how manifestation occurs. It argues that identifying the origin with manifestation itself is not a rhetorical substitution but the only formulation that retains the origin without giving it the position of an item, at the price of self-inclusion. Manifestation is decomposed into three co-present moments: stratification (whatever manifests has gradations, and a wholly manifest world would be indistinguishable from none); coupling (the conditions of possibility of each level contain those of another level); and omission (what is omitted is neither unmanifest, nor unmanifestable, nor nonexistent, but held down by the act of manifesting). Omission yields self-concealment, which in turn rules out a one-directional explanatory chain closing upon itself, and requires a two-way convergence termed co-retrospection. No originality is claimed for the insight of manifestation itself: twenty precedents are compared, and the concealment and disclosure lineage is the densest among them. What is claimed is the independent completion of its treatment, namely the conversion of manifestation from event into structure, and thus into something analyzable, assessable, and falsifiable. Three falsification conditions are stated explicitly.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23878879
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

显隐而非有无 ——本源问题的一条结构化进路

Jingwen Feng
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
preprint

显隐而非有无 ——本源问题的一条结构化进路

Jingwen Feng
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Two formulations dominate the question of the origin (benyuan): asking what the origin is, and asking whence things come. Both presuppose that the origin is an item, and can therefore stand in a relation to whatever is other than itself. Three costs follow. Uniqueness can only be asserted, never derived, since the rule that would adjudicate between two candidate origins itself requires a higher rule. Every causal link between origin and manifestation requires a medium, and mediating the medium generates a regress; internalizing the medium removes the regress but maximizes necessity, leaving no place for the unmanifest. And once the origin is placed beyond speech, statements about it lose their criterion of assessment. The paper proposes a different question: not what the origin is, but how manifestation occurs. It argues that identifying the origin with manifestation itself is not a rhetorical substitution but the only formulation that retains the origin without giving it the position of an item, at the price of self-inclusion. Manifestation is decomposed into three co-present moments: stratification (whatever manifests has gradations, and a wholly manifest world would be indistinguishable from none); coupling (the conditions of possibility of each level contain those of another level); and omission (what is omitted is neither unmanifest, nor unmanifestable, nor nonexistent, but held down by the act of manifesting). Omission yields self-concealment, which in turn rules out a one-directional explanatory chain closing upon itself, and requires a two-way convergence termed co-retrospection. No originality is claimed for the insight of manifestation itself: twenty precedents are compared, and the concealment and disclosure lineage is the densest among them. What is claimed is the independent completion of its treatment, namely the conversion of manifestation from event into structure, and thus into something analyzable, assessable, and falsifiable. Three falsification conditions are stated explicitly.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon