The Effect of Bonus Pool Allocation Strategies on MLB Draft Outcomes

Starting in 2012, Major League Baseball teams have been limited in the amount that they can spend on signing bonuses for players selected in the sport's amateur draft. While each club is constrained by its “bonus pool,” teams have the strategic discretion to allocate their pool across all selections to maximize the aggregate returns on their draft class. Analyzing the MLB Drafts from 2012 to 2022 under these rules, this study evaluates team strategies by estimating the expected surplus value of each draft class after players’ first three professional seasons using MLB data and prospect evaluations by Baseball America and FanGraphs. In evaluating teams’ signing bonus strategies with their first selection—going under, over, or staying near the MLB-recommended slot value—the results offer evidence that no single approach yields better, statistically significant outcomes for a team's entire draft class, implying that the market for draft selections is economically efficient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Economics
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025261503278
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Bonus Pool Allocation Strategies on MLB Draft Outcomes

Russell Ormiston
Journal of Sports Economics
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

The Effect of Bonus Pool Allocation Strategies on MLB Draft Outcomes

Russell Ormiston
article en

Abstract

Starting in 2012, Major League Baseball teams have been limited in the amount that they can spend on signing bonuses for players selected in the sport's amateur draft. While each club is constrained by its “bonus pool,” teams have the strategic discretion to allocate their pool across all selections to maximize the aggregate returns on their draft class. Analyzing the MLB Drafts from 2012 to 2022 under these rules, this study evaluates team strategies by estimating the expected surplus value of each draft class after players’ first three professional seasons using MLB data and prospect evaluations by Baseball America and FanGraphs. In evaluating teams’ signing bonus strategies with their first selection—going under, over, or staying near the MLB-recommended slot value—the results offer evidence that no single approach yields better, statistically significant outcomes for a team's entire draft class, implying that the market for draft selections is economically efficient.

Journal of Sports Economics
Hiram College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon